Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo

9th Circuit Podcasts

show episodes
 
Artwork
 
Every week, Anton Vialtsin (California attorney and YouTuber) discusses legal cases from the Supreme Court, 9th Circuit, and California State Courts. We focus on the First, Second, Fourth, Fifth, and Eighth Amendments. We make predictions and scrutinize the law. Anton Vialtsin handled over a hundred federal criminal cases from initial client interviews through sentencing. He has an in-depth knowledge of the Federal Sentencing Guidelines, the Federal Criminal Codes and Rules, mandatory-minimu ...
  continue reading
 
Artwork

1
LOCKED

Boise State Public Radio

icon
Unsubscribe
icon
icon
Unsubscribe
icon
Monthly
 
A disturbing crime, a desperate act, and how one case could change the way prisons treat some transgender inmates. This podcast follows the case of Adree Edmo, a transgender inmate in Idaho who sued the state for gender confirmation surgery. The state appealed, and now the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals must rule.
  continue reading
 
Artwork
 
Matinée Radio Show.... The Radio to listen to wherever you are! 💃🏻🕺 Tune in and dance to the Matinée Group best beats. 🎧 Next Events: - Circuit Festival Asia 🇹🇭 30th May - 1st June 2025 - Circuit Festival Barcelona 🇪🇸 9th - 17th August 2025 - Matinée World Tour 🌎 - Barcelona Monthly Sessions More info at: www.matineegroup.com
  continue reading
 
Loading …
show series
 
Appealing in the 9th Circuit? Your deadline is 30 days. Don’t let Rule 58’s “separate document” extension lead you astray. Appellate specialists Tim Kowal and Jeff Lewis also discuss ChatGPT 5 (a “market disruptor”), and sanctions strategies in federal court. Appeal Deadline Alert: The 9th Circuit in McNeil v. Guitare held that Rule 58's 150-day ex…
  continue reading
 
Just a couple years ago when we talked with Ernie Svenson, the attorney who talks tech fluently, AI was not even a thing. Now in late 2025, it’s the only thing. Ernie joins Tim and Jeff to discuss the rapidly evolving landscape of AI in legal practice, why AI gives small firms an advantage, and how attorneys can safely leverage these tools without …
  continue reading
 
This is my October 8th Hearing with Judge Jacquelyn D. Melius of Illinois Circuit 19 in Waukegan, Illinois. https://19thcircuitcourt.state.il.us/2081/Judge-Jacquelyn-D-Melius WHY was she so obsessed with getting me in that court house when Justin Serlick was not even appearing via Zoom? WHY WAS HE NOT THERE?! Google Drive Link to my Illinois Circui…
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven and Illinois Circuit 19 Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Thursday, October 2nd, 2025. Google Drive Link to Illinois Circuit 19 Documents covered in this document:…
  continue reading
 
In Part 6 of our Top 10 Criminal Supreme Court Cases series, we break down the landmark case Mapp v. Ohio (1961) — the decision that applied the exclusionary rule to the states. This case is one of the most misunderstood in criminal law. How is Don King connected to this case? Was it really about obscenity? Did it create new rights for defendants? …
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven and Illinois Circuit 19 Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Monday, September 15th, 2025. Google Drive Link to 7-17-2025 Illinois Circuit 19 Petition for Relief and …
  continue reading
 
On Monday, the President’s Religious Liberty Commission (RLC) met for the third time, and First Liberty once again played a major role in the direction and content of the meeting. Commission members heard testimony from First Liberty attorney Keisha Russell and clients Coach Joe Kennedy and Connecticut schoolteacher Marisol Arroyo-Castro. Watch thi…
  continue reading
 
🚔 Can police search your car without a warrant? This episode of our Top 10 Criminal Law Cases and Myths series dives into the history of the “automobile exception” under the Fourth Amendment. In this video, we’ll cover: ✅ The facts behind the Supreme Court’s landmark decision during Prohibition ✅ Why cars are treated differently from homes under th…
  continue reading
 
Justin Derrick Serlick of Daytona, Florida: You are CHOOSING this abuse to the children and I. Peter Arnold and Heather Bendl My Florida Case: https://www.clerk.org/ Heather L. Bendl (Petitioner) vs. Justin D. Serlick (Respondent) Case # 2023-31828 FMCI My Illinois Case: Heather L. Bendl (Petitioner) vs. Justin D. Serlick (Respondent) Case # 13 D 9…
  continue reading
 
Welcome to Part 4 of our series on the Top 10 Supreme Court Criminal Law Cases and the Myths Surrounding Them! In this episode, we break down Terry v. Ohio (1968) — the landmark case that created the legal foundation for stop-and-frisk. 🚔 What really happened in Terry v. Ohio? ⚖️ What did the Supreme Court actually hold? ❌ And what are the biggest …
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven and Illinois Circuit 19 Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Tuesday, September 2nd, 2025. To sign up for "Disrupt the Corrupt" and/or "Support Isn't Silent" Podcast …
  continue reading
 
Think you know the story of Katz v. United States (1967)? Most people believe this landmark Supreme Court case gave everyone a guaranteed right to privacy—but that’s not the full truth. In this video, we break down the biggest myths and misunderstandings about Katz, from whether the Fourth Amendment protects all conversations, to what counts as a “…
  continue reading
 
Failing to cite your secondary sources in briefs is poor form. But is it plagiarism? Jeff and Tim debate. And when the Supreme Court The publishes a case, should it explain itself? PJ Gilbert and Tim say yes, Supreme Court and Jeff disagree. Also in this episode: Can copying from a CLE article really get you sanctioned? Kelly v. Tao suggests… maybe…
  continue reading
 
We are witnessing the impact of the strong judicial appointments made during President Trump’s first term. First Liberty's precedent-setting Supreme Court wins for Coach Kennedy, Gerald Groff, school choice and the Bladensburg Peace Cross are a testimony to the importance of appointing originalist judges. Watch this conversation with Ilya Shapiro, …
  continue reading
 
Think you know the story of Gideon v. Wainwright (1963)? Most people believe this landmark Supreme Court case guaranteed everyone a free lawyer—but that’s not the full truth. In this video, we break down the biggest myths and misunderstandings about Gideon, from whether lawyers are really “free,” to the limits of the right to counsel, to what happe…
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven and Illinois Circuit 19 Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Monday, August 25th, 2025. To sign up for "Disrupt the Corrupt" and/or "Support Isn't Silent" Podcast ple…
  continue reading
 
Watch this message from Allie Beth Stuckey on how showing love through truth allows people of faith to bring clarity to difficult situations. Also hear an important message from Tennessee Attorney General Jonathan Skrmetti about a critical victory at the Supreme Court protecting children from gender transitioning surgeries, treatments and procedure…
  continue reading
 
A few years ago, flight attendants Lacey and Marli were investigated, questioned and fired by Alaska Airlines for asking faith-based questions on an employee-only website about the company’s support of the Equality Act. That’s why we have asked the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals to fix this issue. Specifically, we asked the court to honor Lacey and M…
  continue reading
 
We’ve all heard it on TV: “You have the right to remain silent…” But most people misunderstand entirely what Miranda rights actually mean. In this video, I break down the Top Miranda Rights Myths that could cost you in the real world. 🚨 Learn the truth about: ~Do police always have to read Miranda at arrest? ~Does your case get thrown out if they d…
  continue reading
 
Patrick Hagen is a man of the people—he still proudly uses Times New Roman! But he also has the ear of LinkedIn’s legal-writing elite, with over 36,000 followers as of August 2025. Patrick sits down with Jeff and Tim to share the source and method behind his viral legal-writing tips, how his judicial clerkships shaped his voice, how to hone good wr…
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven and Illinois Circuit 19 Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Tuesday, August 12th, 2025. To sign up for "Disrupt the Corrupt" and/or "Support Isn't Silent" Podcast pl…
  continue reading
 
My Florida friend Krystle Kulpak, who has been attempting to Court Watch my hearings between Florida Circuit 7 and Illinois Circuit 19 since 2024, has asked everyone for Court Watchers in person and virtually for her hearing at 8:30am on Friday, August 22nd, 2025. Pete and I drove to 301 N Park Ave, Sanford, FL 32771 Seminole County Court House Flo…
  continue reading
 
Unlike any other state, California effectively deputizes employees to act as “Private Attorney Generals” to sue employers for PAGA claims—both for themselves, and for their co-workers. But since the individual claims can get compelled to arbitration, employees started to file claims only on behalf of the “body” of co-workers, asserting no claim on …
  continue reading
 
In this video, we break down the California Court of Appeal’s August 2025 decision in People v. Harlow, a case that redefines how courts handle mental health diversion under Penal Code § 1001.36. 🔎 What you’ll learn in this video: ~The story behind People v. Harlow and why the trial court denied diversion ~How the 2022 amendment to Penal Code 1001.…
  continue reading
 
Do you agree every well-rounded student should at least know about America’s important founding documents? Starting this fall, Arkansas will require privately donated copies of the Ten Commandments to be displayed in public school classrooms. We went to Arkansas to talk to state lawmakers and others about this new law.…
  continue reading
 
The California Court of Appeal just delivered a major decision in Muñoz v. Regents (Aug. 5, 2025) — ruling that the University of California’s policy banning undocumented students without federal work permits from campus jobs violates California law. In this video, I break down: ~What this case is about ~Why UC’s “risk management” defense failed ~H…
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven and Illinois Circuit 19 Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Thursday, July 24th, 2025. Google Drive Link to Florida District 5 Court of Appeals and Illinois Circuit …
  continue reading
 
There’s nothing free about a free speech zone. Gabriel Olivier found that out the hard way. Gabriel, a strong believer in sharing his faith with others, routinely stood on a public sidewalk hoping to have peaceful conversations with others. But his city adopted an unconstitutional ordinance that prohibits religious speech on that public sidewalk. W…
  continue reading
 
Can an honest—but unreasonable—mistake erase criminal intent? In People v. Hendrix (2022), the California Supreme Court tackled this exact question after a man was convicted of burglary for walking into a home he thought belonged to his cousin. ⚖️ This video breaks down the Supreme Court’s ruling that a mistake of fact doesn’t have to be reasonable…
  continue reading
 
The Serlick Saga Short Story My name is Heather Louise Bendl. I am from Round Lake Beach, Illinois. I am a mother of four. I am a domestic violence survivor. A Family Court and CPS Corruption Whistleblower and an advocate. This is my story. Justice for the Serlick Children Non-Profit Podcast is available on all platforms. Disclaimer: The narration …
  continue reading
 
This is my weekly update on what has been happening in my Florida Circuit Seven Family Court Case and the Soap Opera that is my life with the Serlick Family. This week I discuss what has been happening with my case since Monday, June 23rd, 2025. Google Drive Link to Florida Circuit 7 DIN 230-245: https://drive.google.com/file/d/1JRgeJ6fYZ0xnhnAIlxg…
  continue reading
 
Summarizing the extraordinary events surrounding the 2020 election, the California State Bar Court’s review decision issued a decision in June 2025 recommending that President Trump’s election attorney, John Eastman, be disbarred. Tim and Jeff unpack. Was Eastman merely theorizing, or actively advocating for a constitutional end-run? What is the di…
  continue reading
 
In this video, attorney Anton Vialtsin breaks down the Ninth Circuit’s 2025 ruling in United States v. Robert Louis Carver — a major case on how California expungements under Penal Code §1203.4 are treated in federal court. Spoiler: they still count! If you thought your old convictions were wiped clean, this case might change your mind. Learn what …
  continue reading
 
This week, the Bladensburg Peace Cross celebrated its 100th Anniversary. We were there to pay our respects to the fallen 49 World War I service members, their mothers, The American Legion and all of those who fought to keep it standing. Watch highlights from the ceremony and a special interview with First Liberty’s Roger Byron on the importance of …
  continue reading
 
SCOTUSblog contributor and EmpiricalSCOTUS analyst Adam Feldman joins us for a recap of the 2024–25 Supreme Court term. We dive into the end-of-term Stat Pack, ideological surprises, dissent patterns, and whether the Court is still a 6–3 conservative lock—or something more nuanced. We discuss: Headlines make an opinion a “blockbuster,” but what rea…
  continue reading
 
🚨 USA v. Bejar-Guizar (2025) – Border Patrol Stop & 9th Circuit Immigration Ruling Explained 🚨 In this video, we break down the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals decision in United States v. Bejar-Guizar, a key 2025 immigration case involving a border patrol stop near San Diego, California. The court upheld the legality of the stop based on reasonable s…
  continue reading
 
Loading …
Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play