Best Randy Noranbrock Podcasts (2025)

1
Sigray v. Carl Zeiss: Patent Anticipation and Obviousness (Fed. Cir., May 23, 2025) 2023-2211 9:56

Play Pause

14h ago9:56

9:56

This is an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent dispute between Sigray, Inc. and Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc. The case involves U.S. Patent No. 7,400,704, owned by Zeiss, which covers X-ray imaging systems with projection magnification. Sigray challenged the patent's validity through an int…

1
Rebecca Curtin v. United Trademark Holdings (Fed. Cir., May 22, 2025) 2023-2140 7:37

5d ago7:37

7:37

This is an opinion from the Federal Circuit addressing whether a consumer, Rebecca Curtin, had the legal right, or statutory standing, to oppose a trademark registration for "RAPUNZEL" covering dolls and toy figures. The case explores the requirements for bringing an opposition under 15 U.S.C. § 1063 of the Lanham Act, particularly focusing on whet…

1
In re Foster (Fed. Cir., May 7, 2025) 2023-1527 7:45

15d ago7:45

7:45

This podcast is for entertainment purposes only and does not create an attorney-client relationship. The AI-generated hosts are not attorneys and are not providing legal advice. The choice of a lawyer is an important decision and should not be based solely upon advertisements.By Randy Noranbrock

1
Regents of the University of California v. Broad Institute (Fed. Cir., May 12, 2025) 2022-1594 10:08

16d ago10:08

10:08

This is an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent interference proceeding between The Regents of the University of California and The Broad Institute. The core dispute involves priority of invention for a CRISPR-Cas9 system using single-guide RNA for editing DNA in eukaryotic cells. The court revi…

1
Ingenico v. IOENGINE (Fed. Cir., May 7, 2025) 2023-1367 11:40

22d ago11:40

11:40

This is a decision on an appeal before the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of Ingenico Inc. v. IOENGINE, LLC. The core issue is IOENGINE's appeal of a jury verdict and subsequent court decisions which found certain patent claims invalid due to prior art, specifically a device known as the DiskOnKey System, includi…

1
In re Kostic (Fed. Cir., May 6, 2025) 2023-1437 7:54

29d ago7:54

7:54

This episode is about an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit in the case of IN RE: MIODRAG KOSTIC, GUY VANDEVELDE, concerning their appeal from a United States Patent and Trademark Office decision. The case centers on a reissue application for U.S. Patent No. 8,494,950, titled "System for Conducting an Exchange o…

1
Fintiv v. PayPal (Fed. Cir., April 30, 2025) 2023-2312 9:45

1M ago9:45

9:45

This is an opinion by the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning a patent infringement lawsuit between Fintiv, Inc. and PayPal Holdings, Inc. Fintiv sued PayPal, asserting infringement of four patents related to a "cloud-based transaction system". The core issue on appeal is the district court's ruling that certain claim …

1
PT Medisafe Technologies v. USPTO (Fed. Cir., April 29, 2025) 2023-1573 8:17

1M ago8:17

8:17

This is an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding PT Medisafe Technologies' attempt to register a dark green color for medical examination gloves as a trademark. The court affirmed the decision of the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, which had denied registration because the proposed color mark was found …

1
Qualcomm v. Apple (Fed. Cir., April 23, 2025) 2023-1208 9:40

1M ago9:40

9:40

This is an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit concerning an appeal involving Qualcomm Incorporated and Apple Inc., with the United States Patent and Trademark Office as an intervenor. The core issue revolves around Apple's challenge to a Qualcomm patent (U.S. Patent No. 8,063,674) in an inter partes review (IPR)…

1
Recentive Analytics v. Fox Corp. (Fed. Cir., April 18, 2025) 2023-2437 8:27

1M ago8:27

8:27

This episode is about a United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit opinion regarding a patent dispute between Recentive Analytics, Inc. and Fox Corp. The core issue on appeal is the patent eligibility of Recentive's patents, which relate to using machine learning for generating television broadcast schedules and network maps. The distri…

1
Sage Products, LLC v. Stewart (Fed. Cir., April 15, 2025) 2023-1603 9:26

1M ago9:26

9:26

This episode is about an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding a patent dispute between Sage Products, LLC and the Acting Under Secretary of Commerce for Intellectual Property. Sage appealed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision that certain claims in two of its patents were unpatentable based on p…

1
In re Forest (Fed. Cir., April 3, 2025) 2023-1178 9:59

2M ago9:59

9:59

This is a decision from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit regarding an appeal by Donald K. Forest. The central issue is whether the Patent Office can grant a patent, specifically U.S. Patent Application No. 15/391,116, after its potential twenty-year term has already expired. The court ultimately dismisses Forest's appeal, …

1
In re Riggs (Fed. Cir., March 24, 2025) 2022-1945 9:23

2M ago9:23

9:23

This episode is about an opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit addresses a dispute concerning a patent application for an integrated logistics system. The core issue revolves around whether a prior published patent application, referred to as Lettich, can be considered prior art against the current application. The…

1
Maquet Cardiovascular v. Abiomed (Fed. Cir., Mar 21, 2025) 2023-2045 13:11

2M ago13:11

13:11

This Federal Circuit opinion details an appeal by Maquet Cardiovascular against a district court's judgment that Abiomed did not infringe Maquet's U.S. Patent No. 10,238,783, which concerns intravascular blood pump systems. The appeal specifically challenges the lower court's interpretation of certain terms within the patent claims, arguing that th…