Share
If you could call a number and say you’re sorry, and no one would know…what would you apologize for? For fifteen years, you could call a number in Manhattan and do just that. This is the story of the line, and the man at the other end who became consumed by his own creation. He was known as “Mr. Apology.” As thousands of callers flooded the line, confessing to everything from shoplifting to infidelity, drug dealing to murder, Mr. Apology realized he couldn’t just listen. He had to do somethi ...
…
continue reading
Manage episode 518756237 series 2789156
Content provided by Scott Reisch and R. Scott Reisch. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Scott Reisch and R. Scott Reisch or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Hain Celestial Group v. Palmquist (No. 24-724), argued November 4, 2025. In this case, the Justices examine whether a federal appellate court must vacate a district court's final judgment when it later concludes the case was improperly removed because a non-diverse defendant was wrongly dismissed at the outset—pitting strict jurisdictional rules against the need for finality in complex product-liability litigation. Hear counsel and the Court test the limits of Caterpillar v. Lewis, diversity jurisdiction, and what happens when federal courts try to fix their mistakes after the fact.
Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store.
#HainCelestial #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #OralArgument #DiversityJurisdiction #CrimeTalk
143 episodes
))
