Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 250340264 series 2291923
Content provided by Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann, Charles Cassidy, and Igor Grossmann. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann, Charles Cassidy, and Igor Grossmann or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Are people being reasonable when they act irrationally? Doesn’t rationality and reasonableness mean the same thing? Charles and Igor kick of the new decade by diving into a messy mix of behavioral economics, nudges, moral philosophy and legal studies, to examine what standards guide people’s decisions. Charles asks Igor about core standards that guide people when they try to make a good decision. Igor unpacks how the standard of a rational agent evolved in the 20th century and what implications it has had for modern economics and politics. Charles wonders if there are any reasonable people left on the Clapham omnibus in London. Igor discusses his new work assessing how most people define rationality and reasonableness, showing that irrational behavior may be a consequence of focusing on reasonableness instead. Welcome to Episode 24.

Links:

  continue reading

66 episodes