Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Rob Christ. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Rob Christ or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Can't Prove God Exists, 1 Peter 3:14-16

44:41
 
Share
 

Manage episode 481826111 series 3625858
Content provided by Rob Christ. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Rob Christ or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

I said "Apologetics is Circular Reasoning" in a video last year. It garnered a lot of hate, cheers, and hundreds of thousands of views on Instagram. The response was fascinating because what should have been a philosophical argument turned into a test of faithfulness. Modern Apologetics, meaning the use of the scientific method to prove the existence and sovereignty of God is fallacious. Apologetics historically had a purpose, and when it is applied as a defense of one's beliefs as in the New Testament, it is perfectly reasonable, but today it is an evangelistic technique and not a valid field of study. I explain the difference between apologia in the Bible and modern apologetics. I refer to respected apologists like William Lane Craig and his techniques and how they differ from many less respected apologists like James White and the historical use of apologia. This reveals a culture of theological control and bullying clothed in intellectual garments.

Reference: "Sin of Certainty" by Peter Enns, pp. 114-5

#apologetics #evangelism #Bible #apologia #edmonds #edmondspres #pcusa

  continue reading

43 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 481826111 series 3625858
Content provided by Rob Christ. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Rob Christ or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

I said "Apologetics is Circular Reasoning" in a video last year. It garnered a lot of hate, cheers, and hundreds of thousands of views on Instagram. The response was fascinating because what should have been a philosophical argument turned into a test of faithfulness. Modern Apologetics, meaning the use of the scientific method to prove the existence and sovereignty of God is fallacious. Apologetics historically had a purpose, and when it is applied as a defense of one's beliefs as in the New Testament, it is perfectly reasonable, but today it is an evangelistic technique and not a valid field of study. I explain the difference between apologia in the Bible and modern apologetics. I refer to respected apologists like William Lane Craig and his techniques and how they differ from many less respected apologists like James White and the historical use of apologia. This reveals a culture of theological control and bullying clothed in intellectual garments.

Reference: "Sin of Certainty" by Peter Enns, pp. 114-5

#apologetics #evangelism #Bible #apologia #edmonds #edmondspres #pcusa

  continue reading

43 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Listen to this show while you explore
Play