Offshoring project management works for software development. It fails for capital construction. The difference: the feedback loop between physical site conditions and project control decisions.

Albert Brier and Nate Habermeyer examine why remote project management models that succeed in IT create invisible risks on construction sites—risks that surface when projects run months behind and millions over budget.

PMI's 2024 Pulse of the Profession report shows remote teams achieving success rates comparable to onsite teams. But that data reflects primarily IT projects where Agile methodologies thrive. Capital construction operates under different constraints.

Physical projects face physical realities. Weather delays deliveries. Soil changes scope. Crane availability dictates sequence. A remote project controls team can't see the mud, can't smell diesel smoke when a generator fails, can't overhear the superintendent mention a supplier issue impacting the critical path.

The digital layer—dashboards, sensors, drone footage, progress tracking—promises to bridge this gap. But sensors capture data, not context. A camera shows a crane in position, not the operator who noticed a defect and stopped work. A progress app shows 73% complete, not the workaround creating future rework.

When project controls professionals lose jobsite knowledge access, planning quality degrades. Offshore schedulers build timelines that look rigorous in Primavera but collapse when field realities intervene. They lack context to challenge unrealistic durations, spot scope creep, or understand how weather will impact concrete pours.

This episode breaks down which functions can move offshore—document control, cost coding, baseline schedules—and which require site proximity: critical path analysis, look-ahead planning, resource allocation.

Albert shares insights from power stations, refineries, and infrastructure projects where hybrid models tried to balance cost with effectiveness. Most failed because they skipped knowledge transfer protocols. Organizations that succeeded used buddy systems pairing onsite and offshore staff, required site visits for scale perspective, and maintained overlapping hours for real-time problem solving.

The conversation addresses an existential risk: the construction industry is raising project managers who have never walked a job site. They build careers managing from spreadsheets, optimizing metrics that don't reflect ground truth. Without field experience, they can't distinguish between a schedule that looks good and one that will work.

For executives evaluating offshore strategies, this episode provides critical questions: Which roles require site proximity? How will offshore teams access real-time field intelligence? What knowledge transfer protocols will maintain institutional memory? Can offshore members visit sites during critical phases?

Offshoring isn't wrong for capital projects. But applying IT models to construction creates risks that don't appear in cost-benefit analyses. Labor savings show up immediately. The consequences—delays, overruns, quality issues—show up 18 months later when it's too late to recover.

Whether you're an executive evaluating proposals, a project controls professional facing restructuring, or a construction leader balancing efficiency with effectiveness, this episode delivers frameworks for deciding where work should happen.

Subscribe to The Risky Planner Podcast for insights on capital project controls, risk management, and excellence in nuclear, mining, infrastructure, and energy sectors.

Presented by Dokainish & Company www.dokainish.com

The Risky Planner podcast delivers expert insights on project controls, capital project management, and strategic planning for today's complex business environment. Subscribe for regular episodes featuring industry leaders and practical advice.