Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 466158871 series 3503557
Content provided by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by with Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, With Leah Pierson, and Sophie Gibert or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode, we speak with Dr. David Thorstad: Assistant Professor of Philosophy at Vanderbilt University, Senior Research Affiliate at the Global Priorities Institute, and author of the blog, Reflective Altruism. We discuss existential risks–threats that could permanently destroy or drastically curtail humanity’s future–and how we should reason about these risks under significant uncertainty.

(00:00) Our introduction

(09:32) Interview begins

(14:32) The longtermism shift

(23:17) Framework for objections to longtermism

(29:47) Overestimating existential risk: population dynamics

(36:06) Overestimating existential risk: cumulative vs. period risk

(39:44) Overestimating existential risk: ignoring background risk

(42:14) The time of perils hypothesis

(46:11) When and where should philosophers speculate?

(1:09:02) Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence

(1:21:44) Regression to the inscrutable and the preface paradox

(1:30:07) The tendency to quantify

Used or referenced:

Bio(un)ethical is a bioethics podcast written by Leah Pierson and Sophie Gibert, with editing and production by Ambedo Media (previous production support by Audiolift.co). Our music is written by Nina Khoury and performed by Social Skills. We are supported by a grant from Amplify Creative Grants.

  continue reading

Chapters

1. #18 David Thorstad: Evidence, uncertainty, and existential risk (00:00:00)

2. Interview begins (00:09:32)

3. The longtermist shift (00:14:32)

4. Framework for objections to longtermism (00:23:17)

5. Overestimating existential risk: population dynamics (00:29:47)

6. Overestimating existential risk: cumulative vs. period risk (00:36:06)

7. Overestimating existential risk: ignoring background risk (00:39:44)

8. The time of perils hypothesis (00:42:14)

9. When and where should philosophers speculate? (00:46:11)

10. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence (01:09:02)

11. Regression to the inscrutable and the preface paradox (01:21:44)

12. The tendency to quantify (01:30:07)

22 episodes