Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 520251631 series 2789156
Content provided by Scott Reisch and R. Scott Reisch. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Scott Reisch and R. Scott Reisch or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Full audio of the Supreme Court oral argument in Rutherford v. United States (No. 24-820), argued November 12, 2025. In this case, the Justices consider whether federal judges may treat nonretroactive sentencing changes in the First Step Act—including the end of mandatory "stacking" under 18 U.S.C. § 924(c)—as "extraordinary and compelling reasons" to grant compassionate release under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Listen as the Court presses both sides on sentencing disparities, the Sentencing Commission's new policy statement, and what fairness looks like for people serving decades-long terms under outdated law.

Check out the official Crime Talk merch at the Crime Talk Store: scottreisch.com/crime-talk-store

*]:pointer-events-auto [content-visibility:auto] supports-[content-visibility:auto]:[contain-intrinsic-size:auto_100lvh] scroll-mt-[calc(var(--header-height)+min(200px,max(70px,20svh)))]" dir="auto" tabindex="-1" data-turn-id= "request-WEB:fe15f7a8-5d7d-4bbe-acb9-5b03f432a73c-1" data-testid= "conversation-turn-4" data-scroll-anchor="true" data-turn= "assistant">

#RutherfordvUnitedStates #SCOTUS #SupremeCourt #FirstStepAct #SentencingReform #CrimeTalk

  continue reading

144 episodes