Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 512878444 series 3682696
Content provided by George Pu. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by George Pu or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

FICO changed their licensing model and two public companies lost 10-20% in a single day. ChatGPT launched shopping with Shopify.

European founders are fleeing to San Francisco.

These look unrelated - but they're all the same story: Infrastructure owners are systematically eliminating middlemen.
Story 1: How FICO destroyed $5 billion in market cap overnight:

  • FICO launched "Mortgage Direct License Program" - boring name, brutal market reaction
  • Equifax stock dropped 8.4%, TransUnion crashed 10.1% in single trading session
  • For decades: FICO charges bureaus ~$5 per score → Bureaus resell to lenders for $10 (100% markup)
  • FICO said "we're going direct to lenders, cutting you out" - new price $4.95 per score (50% reduction)
  • US mortgage industry is $12 trillion - FICO owns IP, scoring model, algorithms
  • Credit bureaus don't own anything valuable - just gatekeepers with smart markups

Why I had to shut down SimpleDirect Financing:

  • Announced sunsetting after 4 years because we didn't own end-to-end experience
  • We were middleman - sent data to lenders who made final decisions (sometimes instant, sometimes 1-2 days)
  • Merchants asking what's going on, homeowners asking what's going on - stuck connecting info in silos
  • Problems weren't our fault but we took the heat
  • As volume increased: Created silo business, never going to make customers happy, just volume-sending machine
  • If you don't own IP, just reselling someone else's API - always at risk

The Credit Karma problem:

  • Don't work with FICO directly - work with Equifax/TransUnion
  • Those agencies can increase prices, make access harder, introduce new requirements
  • Always at mercy of other people's decisions - that's the middleman trap

Story 2: ChatGPT and Shopify just killed Google Ads:

  • OpenAI + Shopify announced instant checkout inside ChatGPT
  • Ask for product recommendations ("cool sunglasses for Europe trip") → instant Shopify merchant recommendations
  • Check out right in chat - no leaving conversation, no merchant website, no account creation, no re-entering card info
  • Shopify stock jumped 6% - connecting 1M+ merchants to 700M weekly ChatGPT users
  • Calling it "agent commerce" - AI agents as personal shoppers handling entire purchase flow

The Amazon vs Shopify problem just got solved:

  • Amazon benefit: Traffic (most visited website, even page 6 products get sales)
  • Shopify problem: Own the tech but handle marketing yourself (hard for most merchants)
  • Shopify now gives merchants access to 700M weekly users without Google/Facebook/Amazon fees
  • Who loses: Google Ads, Facebook Ads, Amazon marketplace fees - all the middlemen taking revenue cuts

But AI desperately needs to monetize:

  • ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Grok all offer free tiers - training costs hundreds of millions to billions
  • Running them costs money on every single message sent
  • Answer has been "VC money, Saudi/UAE/Qatar billions" but can't last forever
  • Elon's xAI adding ads in Grok, ChatGPT testing commerce - all desperate to monetize
  • I pay Claude $20/month for heavy coding use, ChatGPT $20/month for daily use (dozen+ times/day)
  • Value I get worth way more than $20 but they won't raise prices yet due to competition

Founder friend's startup insight:

  • Building company that works with AI platforms + advertisers to inject ads in LLM responses
  • Early/frontier stage, working with smaller AI companies desperate to monetize
  • But ChatGPT/Claude/Gemini/xAI figuring it out too - with direct distribution advantage
  • They can cut out middleman and work directly with advertisers

Story 3: European founders fleeing to America:

  • Wall Street Journal: US investors now dominate European AI funding - 71% of deals by value (up from 57% last year)
  • European founders doing "Delaware flips" - live in Europe, set up US holding companies for American capital
  • One founder: "In London, we'd get half our valuation. In Silicon Valley, investors understand market potential"
  • Another raised $500K in SF within a week - had been trying months in London

Why infrastructure wins (my experience from both sides):

  • I'm from Canada - run companies in both Canada and US, understand this intimately
  • Canadian VCs don't lead rounds - only write support checks after you find US lead
  • My thought: Why would I need you if I can find US lead investor? I'll just find US supporting investors who treat me better
  • 2022 attempted VC raise: Lead from San Francisco, secondary from New York
  • Those guys had money, understood, were risk-takers - wrote $250K angel checks as side thing while running own companies
  • Canadian VCs kept asking "Do you have American investors? Do you have lead?" - their LPs won't let them write checks without lead first

US investors vs everyone else:

  • Sequoia, a16z, Y Combinator built infrastructure for GLOBAL founders (not just US)
  • Write bigger checks, move faster, sometimes commit capital within days
  • European/Canadian VCs: Slower, more conservative, smaller checks
  • Not just about money - it's about SPEED (in AI, speed beats competitors)
  • European funds take months, American funds take weeks

The clear pattern across all three stories:

  • FICO: Companies owning IP eliminate markup - bureaus don't own score so got cut out
  • ChatGPT/Shopify: Commerce infrastructure eliminates website friction - LLMs become new storefront
  • US vs EU capital: Funding infrastructure eliminates slow inefficient middlemen - founders flee to best infrastructure

What this means for your startup - the middle ground is dead:

  • Can't be successful as just marked-up reseller
  • Can't be slow local fund
  • Can't be just website trying to capture traffic
  • LLMs, AI, infrastructure owners, IP owners - all squeezing middlemen out

Your two options:

Option 1: Be the infrastructure owner

  • Own the IP, algorithm, core value creation
  • Be FICO, don't be credit bureau
  • Doesn't take years - start now by owning end-to-end experience
  • Don't leave core customer experience to another API/provider (slow suicide)

Option 2: Be so lean you don't need middlemen

  • Bootstrap as much as possible
  • Build global teams (India, Middle East, South America, North America)
  • Optimize for efficiency so you don't rely on gatekeepers (gatekeepers getting eliminated)

What you CANNOT be:

  • Cannot build business depending on being channel between infrastructure and customers
  • I personally made this decision recently - chose not to enter business like that
  • Even if going well now, infrastructure partners will eventually squeeze you out
  • Not "if" they'll squeeze you - it's "when"

The three critical questions to answer right now:

Q1: Do you own IP/algorithm or reselling someone else's?

  • Happens more than you think - okay if answer reveals vulnerability
  • If white-labeling or charging markup, you're vulnerable
  • AI reducing risk/cost for IP providers to go direct

Q2: Are you destination or can ...

  continue reading

29 episodes