Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 516056947 series 3592552
Content provided by Dr Reece Granger BSc (Hons), BChiro and Dr Reece Granger BSc (Hons). All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Dr Reece Granger BSc (Hons), BChiro and Dr Reece Granger BSc (Hons) or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

We are joined by Professor James Smoliga, who serves as the Director of Research and Faculty Development for Tufts University's, Doctor of Physical Therapy program in Seattle. Professor Smoliga previously held the position of Associate Director of the Human Biomechanics and Physiology Laboratory at High Point University. He is a Fellow of the American College of Sports Medicine and was awarded the 2022 Guy Simoneau Excellence in Research Award. With over 175 publications that have been cited nearly 4,000 times, Professor Smoliga brings a wealth of expertise to our discussion.

In this episode, we explore the criteria for trustworthy research, the essential questions to ask, and how to apply these principles to proposed concussion mitigation devices such as the Q-Collar. We examine from a physiological and evidence-based perspective, why such devices are ineffective in reducing the risk of concussions.

07:05 – What is Research?

13:00 – Ramifications of Unethical Research

15:35 – Introduction, Proposed Method of the Q-Collar & the Flaws in These Studies

18:27 – Why the Altitude Proposal Does Not Work, the Scientific Reasoning, and the Demonstration of Data Interpretation

32:57 – Jugular Compression and Blood Flow

37:17 – Does a Woodpecker Have a Relationship with Concussion & the Q-Collar?

57:06 – The Increased Risk with Potentially No Benefit & How Did It Get FDA Authorized?

1:06:02 – Why Are We Resorting to Possible Protective Equipment for Concussion?

1:11:40 – Fun Research Projects by Professor Smoliga – The Taylor Swift Effect

How an FDA cleared “brain protection” device built on shaky science made it to the NFL: https://www.bmj.com/content/391/bmj.r2028

Dr Mu Yang Episode 55: Academic Research Sleuthing with Dr Mu Yang

Dr James Smoliga: Twitter/X: @jsmoliga

Pseudomedicine for sports concussions in the USA:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442219302509?via%3Dihub

Woodpeckers don’t play football: implications for novel brain protection devices using mild jugular compression: https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/53/20/1262

Reconsidering the woodpecker model of traumatic brain injury: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1474442218301571?via%3Dihub

Team Logo Predicts Concussion Risk Lessons in Protecting a Vulnerable Sports Community from Misconceived, but Highly Publicized Epidemiologic Research: https://journals.lww.com/epidem/fulltext/2017/09000/team_logo_predicts_concussion_risk__lessons_in.17.aspx

You can find all Dr Smoliga’s publications here: https://facultyprofiles.tufts.edu/james-smoliga/publications?favouritesFirst=true&perPage=25&sort=dateDesc&startFrom=0

  continue reading

Chapters

1. (Re-Release): NFL, Q-Collars, Woodpeckers and Concussion with Dr James Smoliga (00:00:00)

2. What is Research? (00:07:05)

3. Ramifications of Unethical Research (00:13:00)

4. Introduction, Proposed Method of the Q-Collar & the Flaws in These Studies (00:15:35)

5. Why the Altitude Proposal Does Not Work, the Scientific Reasoning, and the Demonstration of Data Interpretation (00:18:27)

6. Jugular Compression and Blood Flow (00:32:57)

7. Does a Woodpecker Have a Relationship with Concussion & the Q-Collar? (00:37:17)

8. The Increased Risk with Potentially No Benefit & How Did It Get FDA Authorized? (00:57:06)

9. Why Are We Resorting to Possible Protective Equipment for Concussion? (01:06:02)

10. Fun Research Projects by Professor Smoliga – The Taylor Swift Effect (01:11:40)

101 episodes