Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 482657256 series 3350573
Content provided by Brett Mitchell. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Brett Mitchell or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode, we explore the crucial disconnect between national infection prevention and control (IPC) guidelines and the local policies implemented in residential aged care (RAC) facilities. Brett and Martin talk to Dr Sanne Peters and Dr Kirsty Buising about their recent paper that reports on their recent analysis using the AACTT (Action, Actor, Context, Target, Time) behavioural framework, which reveals a lack of alignment and specificity in many local IPC documents.

We discuss:

  • Why well-intentioned policies often fail to drive behaviour

  • The implications of vague IPC statements in high-risk environments

  • How local RAC settings can better translate national guidelines into actionable, behaviourally specific practices

  • The role of co-design, leadership, and implementation science in bridging the gap

The paper we discuss:

Peters S, Lim LL, Francis JJ, Bennett N, Fetherstonhaugh D, Buising K, et al. Analysis of infection prevention and control documentation in residential aged care based on a behaviour specification framework. Infect Dis Health 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.idh.2025.03.002.

  continue reading

169 episodes