An award-winning cannabis podcast for women, by women. Hear joyful stories and useful advice about cannabis for health, well-being, and fun—especially for needs specific to women like stress, sleep, and sex. We cover everything from: What’s the best weed for sex? Can I use CBD for menstrual cramps? What are the effects of the Harlequin strain or Gelato strain? And, why do we prefer to call it “cannabis” instead of “marijuana”? We also hear from you: your first time buying legal weed, and how ...
…
continue reading
Inside Education 417, Assessment, Feedback & Academic Integrity (25-4-21)
Inside Education - a podcast for educators interested in teaching
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 293667122 series 2366363
Content provided by Sean Delaney. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Sean Delaney or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Presented and produced by Seán Delaney.
This week my guest on the podcast is expert on assessment, feedback and academic integrity, Professor Phillip Dawson from Deakin University. Among the topics we discuss on the podcast are the following:
- How academic integrity is learned throughout our lives – and how even Peppa Pig has been known to flout academic integrity.
- What a secondary school teacher needs to know about academic integrity – values and technical skills
- Academic integrity travels with us: Medical students who have more academic integrity problems have more professional integrity problems as doctors
- Acknowledging student work that is original
- Scalable feedback practices at feedbackforlearning.org.
- Text matching software (e.g. Turn-it-in) can help provide feedback at scale.
- Recognising patterns in errors legitimately made by students on a module
- Estimated instances of cheating among university students, by “outsourcing” their work, range from 6% to 16%
- When the student signals that an assignment is tough, the temptation to cheat appears, literally.
- Intellectual streaking and intellectual candour (Margaret Bearman and Elizabeth Molloy. The importance of faculty sharing their own experiences of receiving feedback with students.
- Contract cheating and blackmail. Lesley Sefcik and Jon Yorke.
- University faculty are more likely to spot contract cheating when they are looking out for it.
- Initial suspicion versus investigation of contract cheating
- Resources to combat contract cheating from the Australian Tertiary Education Quality and Standards Agency.
- Cheating and Assessment Project
- The difference between referencing blunders and contract cheating
- Where students are more/less likely to cheat: types of work, disciplines
- The work of Tracey Bretag and colleagues
- Designing assessments to minimise the likelihood of contract cheating
- Authentic assessments
- Benefits of few, enforceable authentic restrictions
- Review of authentic assessments by Villarroel et al (2020)
- Article on authentic assessment and authentic feedback by Dawson, Carless and Lee (2021).
- Assessment rubrics Article by Dawson
- Article 1 and Article 2 on assessment by James Popham: and
- Analytical, holistic and co-constructed rubrics
- Alfie Kohn podcast
- Winstone and Bowd (2020): the need to disentangle assessment and feedback in higher education
- Pitt & Norton (2017) Student Responses to feedback
- Sustainable assessment and evaluative judgment
- One person who inspires Phillip is his boss, David Boud: https://www.deakin.edu.au/about-deakin/people/david-boud.
- One of David Boud’s articles on sustainable assessment.
300 episodes