Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 517631984 series 3688759
Content provided by Justice Seekers. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Justice Seekers or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode, Natalie and Katrina explore the Delphi murders and how forensic science shaped the case against Richard Allen. They break down the limits of firearm and toolmark analysis, why “ballistics matches” aren’t always scientifically certain, and how flawed forensic methods have led to wrongful convictions across the U.S.
Learn more:
🔬 **Forensic Ballistics Science**

NIJ: Firearm and Toolmark Identification (https://nij.ojp.gov/topics/articles/firearm-and-toolmark-identification)
National Academy of Sciences (2009) Report (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK220360/)
⚖️ **Wrongful Convictions & Forensic Errors**

Innocence Project (https://innocenceproject.org/unvalidated-or-improper-forensic-science/)

National Registry of Exonerations (https://www.law.umich.edu/special/exoneration/Pages/forensics.aspx)

Follow Justice Seekers Podcast for more true cases, legal insights, and the stories behind forensic evidence in American courts.

📱 @JusticeSeekersPodcast | 📩 [email protected]

Mixed & Edited by Next Day Podcast

[email protected]

  continue reading

6 episodes