Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Jennifer Housen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jennifer Housen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

🔒 Executive vs Judiciary: Who Has the Final Say?

14:35
 
Share
 

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on April 27, 2025 18:06 (1M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Manage episode 479407540 series 3649260
Content provided by Jennifer Housen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jennifer Housen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Subscriber-only episode

The separation of powers between branches of government is essential to democratic governance, with various overlaps creating checks and balances that prevent any one branch from gaining too much authority.
• Executive can be controlled by the judiciary, as illustrated in M v Home Office where the court found a government department in contempt
• Courts distinguish between "Crown as monarch" (not subject to judicial oversight) and "Crown as executive" (subject to judicial review)
• Justiciability determines what matters courts can address - individual rights are justiciable while "high policy" decisions generally are not
• The GCHQ case established that royal prerogative powers are subject to judicial review except in specific areas like treaties and national security
• Former Lord Chancellor role spanned all three branches of government until Constitutional Reform Act 2005
• Judicial independence now strengthened through Lord Chief Justice role and Judicial Appointments Commission
• Questions remain about executive influence over judicial appointments
Join us in our next segment where we'll explore the final overlap between the judiciary and legislature to complete our examination of separation of powers in the UK constitution.
💡⚖️ Let’s learn the law together—one session at a time!

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Recap of Executive-Legislature Overlap (00:00:00)

2. Executive and Judiciary Dynamics (00:01:12)

3. The M v Home Office Case (00:01:41)

4. Royal Prerogative Powers (00:05:18)

5. The GCHQ Case Analysis (00:06:58)

6. Lord Chancellor's Evolving Role (00:11:18)

7. Judicial Appointments and Conclusion (00:14:03)

104 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on April 27, 2025 18:06 (1M ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

Manage episode 479407540 series 3649260
Content provided by Jennifer Housen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Jennifer Housen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Subscriber-only episode

The separation of powers between branches of government is essential to democratic governance, with various overlaps creating checks and balances that prevent any one branch from gaining too much authority.
• Executive can be controlled by the judiciary, as illustrated in M v Home Office where the court found a government department in contempt
• Courts distinguish between "Crown as monarch" (not subject to judicial oversight) and "Crown as executive" (subject to judicial review)
• Justiciability determines what matters courts can address - individual rights are justiciable while "high policy" decisions generally are not
• The GCHQ case established that royal prerogative powers are subject to judicial review except in specific areas like treaties and national security
• Former Lord Chancellor role spanned all three branches of government until Constitutional Reform Act 2005
• Judicial independence now strengthened through Lord Chief Justice role and Judicial Appointments Commission
• Questions remain about executive influence over judicial appointments
Join us in our next segment where we'll explore the final overlap between the judiciary and legislature to complete our examination of separation of powers in the UK constitution.
💡⚖️ Let’s learn the law together—one session at a time!

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Recap of Executive-Legislature Overlap (00:00:00)

2. Executive and Judiciary Dynamics (00:01:12)

3. The M v Home Office Case (00:01:41)

4. Royal Prerogative Powers (00:05:18)

5. The GCHQ Case Analysis (00:06:58)

6. Lord Chancellor's Evolving Role (00:11:18)

7. Judicial Appointments and Conclusion (00:14:03)

104 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play