When Does an Administration Infringe on Students' Rights?

Markkula Center for Applied Ethics

Content provided by Markkula Center for Applied Ethics. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Markkula Center for Applied Ethics or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

8y ago 34:31

M4A•Episode home

Fetch error

Hmmm there seems to be a problem fetching this series right now. Last successful fetch was on September 14, 2022 16:46 (2+ y ago)

What now? This series will be checked again in the next day. If you believe it should be working, please verify the publisher's feed link below is valid and includes actual episode links. You can contact support to request the feed be immediately fetched.

The recent overturning of ASG’s ruling on Turning Point USA’s status as an RSO and the University’s censoring of The Santa Clara newspaper have called into question the morality of certain decisions made by the university, particularly when it comes to respecting the rights of students and showing commitment to the common good. In this episode host Miranda Bartosz, Editor in Chief of The Santa Clara newspaper Sophie Mattson, and former ASG Senate Chair and SCCAP Associate Director Avery Unterreiner examine the implications of these ethically loaded events, and their impact on the lives of students on this campus. How can we have faith in the organizations designed to represent students– organizations like ASG and the student newspaper– knowing, as we now do, that the administration can overturn any decision or censor any voice they dislike? How do we respond when we feel ethical boundaries have been crossed, particularly when those who have done the crossing are those who have the most power?

42 episodes

#Society #Santa Clara #Markkula Center For Applied Ethics