Artwork

This is what lightning on Mars sounds like

Nature Podcast

94,024 subscribers

published

iconShare
 
Manage episode 521323095 series 3137
Content provided by [email protected] and Springer Nature Limited. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by [email protected] and Springer Nature Limited or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

00:46 Martian ‘micro-lightning’

The sounds of ‘micro-lightning’ have been recorded by NASA’s Perseverance rover, ending a long search for the phenomenon on Mars. A lack of suitable equipment has made it difficult to gather evidence of lightning on the red planet, but a team of researchers realized that a microphone on Perseverance should be able to pick up the characteristic sounds of electrical discharges. In total they found 55 such examples, along with signs of electrostatic interference indicative of the phenomenon. They dubbed the electric bursts ‘micro-lightning’, as they are far smaller than the lighting seen on Earth, due to the thin Martian atmosphere. The team believe this finding could help better understand Martian chemistry and how best to design equipment to explore the planet’s surface.


Research Article: Chide et al.

News and Views: Is there lightning on Mars?

11:03 Research Highlights

How the biology of male seahorses’ brood pouches appears similar to mammalian pregnancy— plus, why Neanderthals’ jaws were so beefy.


Research Highlight: The origin of male seahorses’ brood pouch

Research Highlight: Neanderthal DNA reveals how human faces form

13:36 The key takeaways from COP30

The UN’s climate conference, COP30, came to a close last week in Brazil. Nature reporter Jeff Tollefson tells us what was and wasn’t agreed during the final negotiations.


Nature: What happened at COP30? 4 science take-homes from the climate summit

22:27 Why women may retract less than men

A new analysis suggests that female authors retract fewer medical science papers than their male counterparts. Women are known to be underrepresented in the medical sciences, but even accounting for this an AI-tool revealed that female authors featured on far fewer retracted research articles. Reporter Jenna Ahart has been investigating and told us why this might be, and what it means for research more broadly.


Nature: Women seem to retract fewer papers than men — but why?


Subscribe to Nature Briefing, an unmissable daily round-up of science news, opinion and analysis free in your inbox every weekday.


Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.

  continue reading

920 episodes