Daily news updates from across the Slate Podcast network.
…
continue reading
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 512379820 series 3540973
Content provided by Canadian Constitution Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Canadian Constitution Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
On Episode 105, we explain why B.C. consenting in court to Aboriginal title of all of Haida Gwaii is causing controversy, we discuss the intersection of artificial intelligence and free speech, and we give you our thoughts on the lawsuit against Toronto Metropolitan University.
Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:
- The Council of the Haida Nation v. British Columbia, 2025 BCSC 1806 (CanLii)
- B.C. government defends withholding details of shíshálh Nation deal (Vancouver Sun)
- Letting the Eby government negotiate Aboriginal title is perilous (Northern Beat)
- B.C. government announces First Nations land pact on Sunshine Coast, months after deal was inked (Globe and Mail)
- The Haida Aboriginal Title Judgment as Potentially Problematic Constitutional Entrenchment (Law for Breakfast)
- Law students sue TMU alleging defamation and discrimination over pro-Palestinian letter (Toronto Star)
- PTCC turns down booking request from OneBC (Penticton Herald)
Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.
The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
110 episodes