Daily news updates from across the Slate Podcast network.
…
continue reading
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 463912654 series 3540973
Content provided by Canadian Constitution Foundation. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Canadian Constitution Foundation or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
On Episode 72, we tell you about our loss in a challenge to B.C.'s COVID-19 vaccine card program; we discuss the Supreme Court's decision to hear a legal challenge to Quebec's ban on religious symbols; and we tell you why hate crime charges in St. Albert are unlikely.
Stories and cases discussed in this week's episode:
- Hamilton leaders denounce ‘dangerous rhetoric’ at Saturday protest near Jackson Square
- Second Cup cuts ties with Montreal franchisee, closes cafés over antisemitic remarks and gesture
- Kassian v. British Columbia, 2025 BCCA 20
- No public spitting, drugs, panhandling, feeding birds or feral cats, and protest limits pitched for Edmonton's latest public behaviour rule book
- ‘Potentially disastrous’: The Hub’s legal experts react to the Supreme Court’s explosive decision regarding Quebec’s secularism law
Not Reserving Judgment is a podcast about Canadian constitutional law hosted by Josh Dehaas, Joanna Baron, and Christine Van Geyn.
The show is brought to you by the Canadian Constitution Foundation, a non-partisan legal charity dedicated to defending rights and freedoms. To support our work, visit theccf.ca/donate.
111 episodes