When you hear the words Alzheimer's disease, what do you think of? The truth is, the picture most of us have of the disease is incomplete. Alzheimer's disease doesn't start when someone starts to lose their memory. It actually starts years – sometimes decades – earlier. The Rethinking Alzheimer's Disease Podcast is an engaging, narrative-style podcast miniseries for those curious or motivated to learn about Alzheimer’s disease. Perhaps you have a family member with Alzheimer’s disease, or ca ...
…
continue reading
MP3•Episode home
Manage episode 433333982 series 3449375
Content provided by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Smriti Mehta and Daniël Lakens, Smriti Mehta, and Daniël Lakens or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
In this episode, we discuss review boards for research with human subjects. Are they necessary? Are they efficient? Are scientists well equipped to make judgements about ethics? And are economists more ethical than psychologists?
Shownotes
- Whitney, S. N. (2015). Balanced ethics review: A guide for institutional review board members. Springer.
- Schrag, Z. M. (2010). Ethical imperialism: Institutional review boards and the social sciences, 1965–2009. JHU Press.
- Kinsey Reports
- How Institutional Review Boards can be (and are) Weaponized Against Academic Freedom
- Weaponizing the IRB 2.0
- Psychologists’ Involvement in Torture and the APA. Psychology Today.
92 episodes