Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Chris Whitehead, Senior Environmental Justice Consultant, Chris Whitehead, and Senior Environmental Justice Consultant. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chris Whitehead, Senior Environmental Justice Consultant, Chris Whitehead, and Senior Environmental Justice Consultant or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

S2: E7 - Shaping Policy for Sustainable Decarbonization

59:38
 
Share
 

Manage episode 486669297 series 3565747
Content provided by Chris Whitehead, Senior Environmental Justice Consultant, Chris Whitehead, and Senior Environmental Justice Consultant. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chris Whitehead, Senior Environmental Justice Consultant, Chris Whitehead, and Senior Environmental Justice Consultant or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

I almost decided to name this episode, "so this is why we can't have nice things." On our last episode, Doug Houseman and Mark Jacobson showed us what's possible albeit challenging from a technical perspective. This episode Eric Beightel (Federal Strategy Director, Environmental Science Associates) and Josh Kaplowitz (Senior Counsel, Troutman Pepper Locke LLP) walk us through grid decarbonization and renewables development from a legal and policy perspective. Simply put, our current regulatory models aren't made for this. But if you decide to rip it all down and start over (NEPA reference there), how do you make sure the new model is more up to the challenge?

We cover a lot in this episode, from the critical role of SCOTUS over the next four years, whether or not we are in an energy emergency (as defined historically), environmental assessments and stakeholdering as part of the permitting process, federalism, and "what you wish we could have done differently over the last four years".

Josh and Eric have been right in the middle of this at the highest levels during the previous administration and are what I'd like to call objective optimists on the topic. I suggest watching the previous episode before you watch this one. Good policy should focus on technical challenges and look to improve timelines.

Enjoy!

  continue reading

26 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 486669297 series 3565747
Content provided by Chris Whitehead, Senior Environmental Justice Consultant, Chris Whitehead, and Senior Environmental Justice Consultant. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Chris Whitehead, Senior Environmental Justice Consultant, Chris Whitehead, and Senior Environmental Justice Consultant or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Send us a text

I almost decided to name this episode, "so this is why we can't have nice things." On our last episode, Doug Houseman and Mark Jacobson showed us what's possible albeit challenging from a technical perspective. This episode Eric Beightel (Federal Strategy Director, Environmental Science Associates) and Josh Kaplowitz (Senior Counsel, Troutman Pepper Locke LLP) walk us through grid decarbonization and renewables development from a legal and policy perspective. Simply put, our current regulatory models aren't made for this. But if you decide to rip it all down and start over (NEPA reference there), how do you make sure the new model is more up to the challenge?

We cover a lot in this episode, from the critical role of SCOTUS over the next four years, whether or not we are in an energy emergency (as defined historically), environmental assessments and stakeholdering as part of the permitting process, federalism, and "what you wish we could have done differently over the last four years".

Josh and Eric have been right in the middle of this at the highest levels during the previous administration and are what I'd like to call objective optimists on the topic. I suggest watching the previous episode before you watch this one. Good policy should focus on technical challenges and look to improve timelines.

Enjoy!

  continue reading

26 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play