Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by RBN Podcast and RBN Energy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by RBN Podcast and RBN Energy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Big Deal - Supreme Court's Ruling on Uinta Basin Railway Is a Big Win for Energy Infrastructure Projects

11:20
 
Share
 

Manage episode 486764828 series 2624419
Content provided by RBN Podcast and RBN Energy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by RBN Podcast and RBN Energy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Midstream developers have complained for decades that federal courts reviewing agency approvals for their infrastructure projects have cast too wide a net — that is, instead of requiring agencies to simply analyze the specific environmental impacts of the project in question, the courts have been insisting regulators also examine the effects of the upstream and downstream activities the project would enable. As we discuss in today’s RBN blog, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week that under the all-important National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, it’s up to regulators to set the boundaries of their environmental review and that courts should defer to their judgment as long as they fall within a “broad zone of reasonableness.”
  continue reading

1479 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 486764828 series 2624419
Content provided by RBN Podcast and RBN Energy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by RBN Podcast and RBN Energy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Midstream developers have complained for decades that federal courts reviewing agency approvals for their infrastructure projects have cast too wide a net — that is, instead of requiring agencies to simply analyze the specific environmental impacts of the project in question, the courts have been insisting regulators also examine the effects of the upstream and downstream activities the project would enable. As we discuss in today’s RBN blog, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled last week that under the all-important National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) of 1969, it’s up to regulators to set the boundaries of their environmental review and that courts should defer to their judgment as long as they fall within a “broad zone of reasonableness.”
  continue reading

1479 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play