Share
Being an American right now is a wild ride. Every day brings a new controversy, breathless media narratives, and the same loud voices rushing in to score political points. Then another Truth Social post drops and the circus moves on. But all that noise is drowning out the actual story. On her new podcast Runaway Country, veteran journalist Alex Wagner talks to the voices at the center of the headlines: from the fringes of the resistance, to the marrow of MAGA, to the many people who’ve found ...
…
continue reading
Manage episode 363611266 series 2863424
Content provided by SCOTUSblog. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by SCOTUSblog or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Since 2017, the Supreme Court has significantly increased its use of the process by which the justices hear and resolves emergency appeals, sometimes known as the shadow docket. These decisions are made without oral argument and often come in short unsigned orders. Stephen Vladeck, the Charles Alan Wright Chair in Federal Courts at the University of Texas School of Law, has closely tracked that change and its impact on the court as an institution in recent years. Vladeck joins Amy to discuss his new book The Shadow Docket.
We are taking a hiatus from our regularly scheduled episodes this spring. We hope to be back soon.
(Music by Keys of Moon Music via Soundcloud)
Hosted on Acast. See acast.com/privacy for more information.
97 episodes
))
