In this episode, organizational psychologists Neil Jacobs and Dr. Taylere Markewich explore the concept of the "double bind" in workplace leadership—those contradictory messages that leave employees frozen and confused. A double bind occurs when leaders send mixed messages, saying one thing while their actions communicate something entirely different. Common examples include organizations declaring "we're family" while conducting layoffs, asking employees to "bring your whole authentic self" while expecting conformity, or promoting "empowerment" while maintaining tight control over decisions. These contradictions, often unintentional, create significant psychological strain for employees who find themselves unable to succeed at meeting both conflicting expectations simultaneously. The consequences range from disengagement and cynicism to broken psychological contracts and even counterproductive work behaviors.

Neil and Taylere share real-world examples from their coaching practices, including a leader who was told to prioritize efficiency but faced pushback for not focusing on employee feelings, and another who claimed to empower her team but consistently overrode their decisions without sharing organizational constraints upfront. The hosts emphasize that employees must learn to recognize double binds, assess their severity, and adapt to organizational reality rather than rebel against it. This means approaching job opportunities with healthy skepticism, testing promises with specific scenarios, and managing one's psychological contract by understanding what you're truly getting in exchange for what you're giving. As Taylere notes, your communication experience going into an organization will likely be your communication experience within it.

For leaders, the solution lies in making implicit expectations explicit and acknowledging the paradoxes that naturally exist in organizational culture. Rather than relying on aspirational clichés, leaders should describe how things actually work, including the tensions and limitations that exist. They must create space for employees to discuss contradictions without being labeled as complainers, maintain consistency from recruitment through employment, and go back to correct initial messaging when organizational realities shift. Ultimately, solving the double bind requires correcting communication issues and taking responsibility for the gap between what's promised and what's delivered, recognizing that congruent communication isn't just about avoiding difficult conversations—it's essential for driving organizational success.

Have a pause of the month or an episode idea? Email us at [email protected]