Share
The Washington Post's Presidential podcast explores how each former American president reached office, made decisions, handled crises and redefined the role of commander-in-chief. It was released leading up to up to Election Day 2016, starting with George Washington in week one and ending on week 44 with the president-elect. New special episodes in the countdown to the 2020 presidential election highlight other stories from U.S. presidential history that can help illuminate our current momen ...
…
continue reading
Manage episode 519904761 series 11242
Content provided by Armed American Radio. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Armed American Radio or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Summary
The conversation delves into the implications of recent legal decisions on gun rights, particularly focusing on the Bruin decision and its potential impact on ongoing cases. Mark Walters discusses the challenges faced in the judicial system, including the difficulty of getting cases to the Supreme Court and the influence of lower court judges appointed by previous administrations.
Takeaways
The Bruin decision has significant implications for gun rights.
Winning cases in court is a challenging process.
Less than 1% of filed cases reach the Supreme Court.
Judicial stalling tactics are common in legal battles.
Financial burdens are a strategy to deter legal action.
Lower court judges may not uphold constitutional principles.
The political landscape influences judicial decisions.
The fight for gun rights is ongoing and complex.
Legal strategies are essential for success in court.
Understanding the judicial system is crucial for advocacy.
Keywords
gun rights, legal decisions, Supreme Court, judicial challenges, constitutional law
1282 episodes
))
