Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 492064274 series 2902214
Content provided by The BMJ. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by The BMJ or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

There is a growing market of new diagnostic tests being targeted directly to consumers, often before high-quality evidence about their effectiveness is available. This is causing issues in clinical practice as patients arrive at the NHS’s front door with results that have alarmed them.

The accuracy of these tests is unknown, developed in idealised populations then released to the general public, the positive predictive value of these tests plummet in the real world - but false positives require extensive further testing to rule out problems.

But advances in technology, with real potential, and commercial and societal incentives have aligned - these tests aren’t going to go away.

So how do we start grappling with the power and pitfalls of early diagnosis - define exactly how we should be evaluating and regulating this growing industry, and what changes will we need to put in place in our healthcare systems to make sure an early diagnosis is good diagnosis?

In this podcast;

Peter Donnelly, professor of public health medicine at the University of St Andrews

Bethany Jenkins, professor of health economics at the University of Leeds

Stuart Hogarth, researcher at the University of Cambridge

Andreas Halner, co-founder of Oxford Cancer Analytics

Alex Richter, director of clinical immunology services at the University of Birmingham

Carl Heneghan, director of the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford.

This podcast was recorded at the Evidence Based Early Diagnosis Conference

  continue reading

80 episodes