Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 455138506 series 3574659
Content provided by Pete Wright and TruStory FM. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Pete Wright and TruStory FM or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Ocean and Jim delve into the chaotic gridiron of Necessary Roughness, a film ostensibly inspired by the SMU football scandal. But is it a true underdog story, a paean to the resilience of the human spirit against overwhelming odds? Or is it simply a charmingly goofy comedy, a cinematic comfort food best enjoyed with a side of suspended disbelief?

This isn't your typical sports movie dissection. Ocean and Jim explore the film's surprisingly complex layers. They ponder the curious case of Paul Blake, the 34-year-old freshman quarterback, and question his motivations for returning to the academic pressure cooker. They dissect the almost Shakespearean villainy of Dean Elias, whose disdain for the sport fuels a hilariously absurd prison scrimmage. And, of course, they celebrate the comedic genius of Sinbad, whose performance transcends mere acting and becomes a force of nature.

But beneath the surface of slapstick and one-liners, Ocean and Jim find a deeper truth. Necessary Roughness, they argue, is a "sick movie," a cinematic balm for weary minds. It's a film that doesn't demand intense scrutiny, but rather invites you to surrender to its goofy charm. It’s a testament to the enduring power of laughter, a reminder that sometimes, the best way to confront life's rough patches is with a healthy dose of absurdity.

Join Ocean and Jim as they navigate the complexities of Necessary Roughness, uncovering the hidden gems within this seemingly simple sports comedy. They explore the film's surprising relevance to the modern era of NIL deals and the evolving landscape of college athletics. They grapple with the film’s uneven character development, questioning whether its comedic ambitions overshadow its potential for deeper emotional resonance. And they celebrate the film’s enduring appeal, its ability to transport us to a simpler time when the stakes were lower and the laughs were louder.


---
Learn more about supporting this podcast by becoming a member. It's just $5/month or $55/year. Visit our website to learn more.

  continue reading

20 episodes