Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 191099805 series 1727475
Content provided by Kevin deLaplante, Kevin deLaplante | Philosopher, and Critical Thinking Educator. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Kevin deLaplante, Kevin deLaplante | Philosopher, and Critical Thinking Educator or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode I explore reasons why standard critical thinking textbooks say almost nothing about the psychology of human reasoning and persuasion. Topics include: - argumentation as rhetoric vs argumentation as tool for philosophical reasoning - why Plato was so hard on the Sophists - what it was like being socialized into philosophy as a student - the martial arts training hall as a ritualized space - why the classroom is like a dojo for training in the martial art of rational argumentation - understanding the rules inside the dojo vs the rules outside the dojo - argumentation and the dream of universal reason - why critical thinking needs both approaches to argumentation

  continue reading

38 episodes