Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Boyes Turner. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Boyes Turner or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Sighing, CNN & hybrid working: A deep dive into current Employment Law cases

29:58
 
Share
 

Manage episode 486625500 series 3551504
Content provided by Boyes Turner. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Boyes Turner or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode of The Employment Law Pod, Partners Andrew Whiteaker and Helen Goss dissect a series of recent and thought-provoking employment law developments:

Sighing as Discrimination?
They begin with the case of Watson v Roke Manor Research, where a manager’s non-verbal expressions such as sighing, eye-rolling, and huffing were deemed discriminatory toward an employee with ADHD. The discussion explores how microaggressions and unconscious bias can contribute to a hostile work environment, and why employers must take reasonable adjustments seriously.

CNN and Cross-Border Employment Rights
Next, Helen breaks down CNN v Bhatti, a case involving a British journalist injured abroad who challenged CNN's attempt to block her UK tribunal claims. Despite a US-governed contract and overseas assignments, the courts found a strong enough UK connection for the case to proceed, offering a valuable reminder about jurisdictional reach in employment law.

Hybrid Working: A Growing Flashpoint
Andy revisits the ever-evolving topic of hybrid working, focusing on HSBC's directive tying office attendance to performance reviews and bonuses. They examine trends across major employers (Barclays, Santander, PwC) and discuss the potential impact on employee satisfaction and retention, particularly when workers moved during the pandemic.

A Garden, a Meeting, and a Tribunal
Finally, they cover a quirky but relevant tribunal case where an employee’s refusal to attend a face-to-face mediation, opting instead to supervise gardeners at home while joining via Teams, was cited by the employer as blameworthy conduct. The tribunal disagreed, underscoring ongoing tensions around remote vs. in-person expectations.

Episode Links

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Sighing, CNN & hybrid working: A deep dive into current Employment Law cases (00:00:00)

2. Sighing as Disability Discrimination (00:01:40)

3. CNN's Global Jurisdiction Battle (00:10:26)

4. The Rise and Resistance of Hybrid Working (00:17:03)

5. Teams vs In-Person: Gardener supervision case (00:25:34)

33 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 486625500 series 3551504
Content provided by Boyes Turner. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Boyes Turner or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

In this episode of The Employment Law Pod, Partners Andrew Whiteaker and Helen Goss dissect a series of recent and thought-provoking employment law developments:

Sighing as Discrimination?
They begin with the case of Watson v Roke Manor Research, where a manager’s non-verbal expressions such as sighing, eye-rolling, and huffing were deemed discriminatory toward an employee with ADHD. The discussion explores how microaggressions and unconscious bias can contribute to a hostile work environment, and why employers must take reasonable adjustments seriously.

CNN and Cross-Border Employment Rights
Next, Helen breaks down CNN v Bhatti, a case involving a British journalist injured abroad who challenged CNN's attempt to block her UK tribunal claims. Despite a US-governed contract and overseas assignments, the courts found a strong enough UK connection for the case to proceed, offering a valuable reminder about jurisdictional reach in employment law.

Hybrid Working: A Growing Flashpoint
Andy revisits the ever-evolving topic of hybrid working, focusing on HSBC's directive tying office attendance to performance reviews and bonuses. They examine trends across major employers (Barclays, Santander, PwC) and discuss the potential impact on employee satisfaction and retention, particularly when workers moved during the pandemic.

A Garden, a Meeting, and a Tribunal
Finally, they cover a quirky but relevant tribunal case where an employee’s refusal to attend a face-to-face mediation, opting instead to supervise gardeners at home while joining via Teams, was cited by the employer as blameworthy conduct. The tribunal disagreed, underscoring ongoing tensions around remote vs. in-person expectations.

Episode Links

  continue reading

Chapters

1. Sighing, CNN & hybrid working: A deep dive into current Employment Law cases (00:00:00)

2. Sighing as Disability Discrimination (00:01:40)

3. CNN's Global Jurisdiction Battle (00:10:26)

4. The Rise and Resistance of Hybrid Working (00:17:03)

5. Teams vs In-Person: Gardener supervision case (00:25:34)

33 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play