Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Diddy's Lawyers Go Scorched Earth Over The Testimony Given By Dr. Dawn Hughes (5/26/25)

22:31
 
Share
 

Manage episode 485053755 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
In this letter to Judge Subramanian, attorneys for Sean Combs renew and support a prior motion to strike the testimony of the prosecution’s expert witness, Dr. Dawn Hughes, who they argue repeatedly violated the court’s limitations on the scope of her testimony. Despite the court sustaining several objections during her direct examination, the defense contends that Hughes consistently disregarded the court’s rulings by offering expanded responses that went beyond the prosecutors’ questions. They assert that these actions were not only persistent but appeared to be deliberate, making it impossible to keep her testimony within the court’s set boundaries.
The defense further argues that Hughes's testimony, particularly regarding victim coping mechanisms and memory, strayed from her disclosed areas of expertise and introduced inadmissible material. They claim her memory-related assertions amounted to speculative “junk science,” designed to shield government witnesses from credibility challenges by implying that any memory lapse is inherently legitimate. This, they argue, is not valid expert testimony but rather a vague, all-encompassing narrative tool meant to reinforce the prosecution’s case regardless of the facts. As such, they request that Hughes’s entire testimony be struck from the record.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.351.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
  continue reading

1033 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 485053755 series 3380507
Content provided by Bobby Capucci. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bobby Capucci or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
In this letter to Judge Subramanian, attorneys for Sean Combs renew and support a prior motion to strike the testimony of the prosecution’s expert witness, Dr. Dawn Hughes, who they argue repeatedly violated the court’s limitations on the scope of her testimony. Despite the court sustaining several objections during her direct examination, the defense contends that Hughes consistently disregarded the court’s rulings by offering expanded responses that went beyond the prosecutors’ questions. They assert that these actions were not only persistent but appeared to be deliberate, making it impossible to keep her testimony within the court’s set boundaries.
The defense further argues that Hughes's testimony, particularly regarding victim coping mechanisms and memory, strayed from her disclosed areas of expertise and introduced inadmissible material. They claim her memory-related assertions amounted to speculative “junk science,” designed to shield government witnesses from credibility challenges by implying that any memory lapse is inherently legitimate. This, they argue, is not valid expert testimony but rather a vague, all-encompassing narrative tool meant to reinforce the prosecution’s case regardless of the facts. As such, they request that Hughes’s entire testimony be struck from the record.
to contact me:
[email protected]
source:
gov.uscourts.nysd.628425.351.0.pdf
Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/the-epstein-chronicles--5003294/support.
  continue reading

1033 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play