Share
The Knowledge at Wharton Network Acast feed serves as a curated showcase highlighting the best content from our podcast collection. Each week, we feature one standout episode from each show in the Wharton Podcast Network, giving listeners a comprehensive sample of our diverse business and academic content. This rotating selection allows audiences to discover new shows within our network while experiencing the depth and variety of Wharton's thought leadership across different topics and forma ...
…
continue reading
Manage episode 355438799 series 1635014
Content provided by Robin Powell and The Evidence-Based Investor. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Robin Powell and The Evidence-Based Investor or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
As regular TEBI readers know, the academic evidence overwhelmingly shows that most investors are better off investing in low-cost index funds.
But most financial advisers still recommend actively managed funds instead. As a result, investors are ending up with pension pots considerably smaller than they should be.
So, is there a case for suing advisers who carry on investing their clients’ money in expensive funds that fail to deliver? Phil Miller certainly thinks so. A former adviser himself, Phil’s company Pension Focus represents clients who feel they’ve been badly advised.
58 episodes
))
