Share
The simplest questions often have the most complex answers. The Philosopher's Zone is your guide through the strange thickets of logic, metaphysics and ethics.
…
continue reading
Manage episode 418202867 series 2853322
Content provided by Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Bruce Nielson and Peter Johansen, Bruce Nielson, and Peter Johansen or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
This is the first of our two part series (that may or may not be released back-to-back) where Bruce delves into the work Douglas Hofstadter, specifically the book Surfaces and Essences. We consider what is the relationship—if there is any—between critical rationalism and Hofstadter's idea that analogy is a core mechanism of human cognition. Is it fair to criticize Hofstadter's ideas as being inductivism in disguise? Could something like what Hofstadter suggests (i.e. analogy) be central to human consciousness and creation of AGI?
Follow us on Twitter: https://twitter.com/bnielson01
119 episodes
))
