Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by Susan Wise Bauer and Susanna Jarrett. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Susan Wise Bauer and Susanna Jarrett or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

Teaching Controversial Topics

54:26
 
Share
 

Manage episode 438099922 series 3508371
Content provided by Susan Wise Bauer and Susanna Jarrett. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Susan Wise Bauer and Susanna Jarrett or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Guiding Principles:

Gretchen Ronnevik Quote We LOVE:

“When I taught classical writing to teens, there's an element to formal rhetoric called "refutation" where you address the arguments opposed to your thesis. In refutation, it's important to present the arguments of your opponents in a way that they would feel well represented, so that you can talk about where they are wrong in their argument, point by point, instead of resorting to ad hominem attacks, or misrepresentation. In classical rhetoric, ad hominem attacks, and twisting the words of your opponent where they would say "but that's not what I said, nor how I meant it," is actually the weakest way to refute their arguments. It shows that you don't have a good case against their issue, so you resort to theatrics and distractions instead. The reason that you want your opponents to agree with your representation of them is that you are seeking to win them over and persuade them. If they feel they have been misrepresented, they will never be persuaded, they will just continue to clarify again and again, until they realize you have no intention of actually hearing them.”

Politics

Economics

  • Uncle Eric Books: We mention using these books to explain the Libertarian or Free Market view of economics
  • Tuttle Twins: We mention this as an example of an economics/government program for kids that has a stated Libertarian slant
  • Older students should read the strongest arguments for each major economic theory and/or the source material, like The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith for Free Market Economics or The General Theory of Employment by John Maynard Keynes for Keynesian economics.
  • Resources for looking for rhetoric stage economics courses (let us know your comments about potential slants!):

Science

  • Biologos website: Susan mentions this website in the context of teaching theology and science.
  • Extremely American Podcast: Susan mentions this podcast when positing that there is a link between creationism and Christian Nationalist political ideas. This episode specifically tackles that link.

Corrections:

  • At 31:10 Susan mentions the "Institution of Creationism Research," it should be "Institute of Creation Research."
  • (00:00) - Season of Hot Takes Intro
  • (01:15) - Episode Intro
  • (01:28) - Teaching controversial topics
  • (03:31) - "I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It"
  • (04:31) - US Government & Politics | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (07:21) - How to make space for terrifying questions
  • (13:50) - US Government & Politics | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (22:25) - Economics | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (30:26) - Break
  • (32:03) - Science | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (41:04) - Reading | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (46:20) - How to teach in a community with diverse values
  • (53:18) - Outro
  continue reading

40 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 438099922 series 3508371
Content provided by Susan Wise Bauer and Susanna Jarrett. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Susan Wise Bauer and Susanna Jarrett or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

Guiding Principles:

Gretchen Ronnevik Quote We LOVE:

“When I taught classical writing to teens, there's an element to formal rhetoric called "refutation" where you address the arguments opposed to your thesis. In refutation, it's important to present the arguments of your opponents in a way that they would feel well represented, so that you can talk about where they are wrong in their argument, point by point, instead of resorting to ad hominem attacks, or misrepresentation. In classical rhetoric, ad hominem attacks, and twisting the words of your opponent where they would say "but that's not what I said, nor how I meant it," is actually the weakest way to refute their arguments. It shows that you don't have a good case against their issue, so you resort to theatrics and distractions instead. The reason that you want your opponents to agree with your representation of them is that you are seeking to win them over and persuade them. If they feel they have been misrepresented, they will never be persuaded, they will just continue to clarify again and again, until they realize you have no intention of actually hearing them.”

Politics

Economics

  • Uncle Eric Books: We mention using these books to explain the Libertarian or Free Market view of economics
  • Tuttle Twins: We mention this as an example of an economics/government program for kids that has a stated Libertarian slant
  • Older students should read the strongest arguments for each major economic theory and/or the source material, like The Wealth of Nations by Adam Smith for Free Market Economics or The General Theory of Employment by John Maynard Keynes for Keynesian economics.
  • Resources for looking for rhetoric stage economics courses (let us know your comments about potential slants!):

Science

  • Biologos website: Susan mentions this website in the context of teaching theology and science.
  • Extremely American Podcast: Susan mentions this podcast when positing that there is a link between creationism and Christian Nationalist political ideas. This episode specifically tackles that link.

Corrections:

  • At 31:10 Susan mentions the "Institution of Creationism Research," it should be "Institute of Creation Research."
  • (00:00) - Season of Hot Takes Intro
  • (01:15) - Episode Intro
  • (01:28) - Teaching controversial topics
  • (03:31) - "I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It"
  • (04:31) - US Government & Politics | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (07:21) - How to make space for terrifying questions
  • (13:50) - US Government & Politics | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (22:25) - Economics | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (30:26) - Break
  • (32:03) - Science | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (41:04) - Reading | I Don't Believe It, But I Must Teach It
  • (46:20) - How to teach in a community with diverse values
  • (53:18) - Outro
  continue reading

40 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Copyright 2025 | Privacy Policy | Terms of Service | | Copyright
Listen to this show while you explore
Play