Is the Turing Test Outdated?

Thinking Machines: AI & Philosophy

Content provided by Daniel Reid Cahn. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Daniel Reid Cahn or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

1+ y ago 45:17

MP3•Episode home

In 1950, Alan Turing asked, “Can machines think?” He suggested the Imitation Game as a test to evaluate whether a machine can think, more commonly called the “Turing Test.” Today we ask, is the Turing Test outdated? Joining Slingtalks this week are Kristian Freed & Guilherme Freire, founding engineers at Slingshot. Guilherme argues against the Turing Test, Kristian argues in favor.

Key topics they discuss include:

A recent paper claims that GPT-4 comes close to passing the Turing Test. Is the paper’s result valid? How close are we to passing the Turing Test?
Defining the Turing Test and understanding the various iterations on its original framing since 1950. Are there levels in passing the Turing Test?
Who is the Turing Test’s interrogator? And who is the human participant?
If AI could pass the Turing Test, would that necessarily mean that most remote employees would be redundant?
Is an AI’s ability to emulate human-like intelligence and deceive humans sufficient for intelligence? Is it necessary?
What are the moral and philosophical implications of AI passing the Turing Test? Is intelligence morally significant? Is consciousness relevant?

Share your thoughts with us at [email protected] or tweet us @slingshot_ai.

26 episodes

#Tech #Machine Learning #Artificial Intelligence #Society #Philosophy #Daniel Reid Cahn #MLOps