Welcome to Crimetown, a series produced by Marc Smerling and Zac Stuart-Pontier in partnership with Gimlet Media. Each season, we investigate the culture of crime in a different city. In Season 2, Crimetown heads to the heart of the Rust Belt: Detroit, Michigan. From its heyday as Motor City to its rebirth as the Brooklyn of the Midwest, Detroit’s history reflects a series of issues that strike at the heart of American identity: race, poverty, policing, loss of industry, the war on drugs, an ...
…
continue reading
Content provided by Tony Brueski and Real Story Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tony Brueski and Real Story Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Similar to True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
True crime investigations from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Veteran legal affairs journalist Bill Rankin takes you inside the courtroom to break down the story and the criminal justice system. This award-winning series investigates Georgia’s most important cases with fact-based reporting. Season 10 will focus on the historic indictment of former President Donald Trump in Fulton County, Georgia, led by District Attorney Fani Willis. Co-hosted by senior reporter Tamar Hallerman and editor ...
…
continue reading
The UK Column is an independent news organisation analysing the information war. Operating without financial backing or external investment, we remain free from advertisers, foundations, and political parties, relying solely on support from our audience through memberships and donations.
…
continue reading
Daily news updates from across the Slate Podcast network.
…
continue reading
David Aaronovitch and a panel of experts and insiders present in-depth explainers on big issues in the news
…
continue reading
Commentary is America's premier monthly magazine of opinion: General, yet Jewish. Highly variegated, with a unifying perspective.Listen to The Commentary Magazine Podcast, along with more than 40 other original podcasts, at Ricochet.com. No paid subscription required.
…
continue reading
Lyn and Chris Dawson appear to have the perfect marriage. He's a star footballer and popular high school teacher. She's a devoted wife and mother. They share a beautiful home above Sydney's northern beaches. But when Lyn goes missing, dark secrets are buried. This is no fairytale, but a sordid story of strangely close twin brothers, teenage student lovers, and probable murder. The Australian's Hedley Thomas digs deep into a cold case which has been unsolved for 36 years, uncovering startling ...
…
continue reading
America’s premier Sunday morning public affairs program. For nearly 70 years, Face the Nation has sought to help audiences understand how current events affect their lives. Today, that mission remains the same. Hear moderator Margaret Brennan’s illuminating and informative interviews with elected officials, policy experts and foreign leaders. Face the Nation airs Sundays at 10:30 AM, ET on the CBS Television Network and at 12 PM, ET on the CBS News Streaming Network. Face the Nation is also ...
…
continue reading
Host Marco Werman and his team of producers bring you the world's most interesting stories that remind us just how small our planet really is.
…
continue reading
End of Western Civilization got you down? All is tickety-boo on The Andrew Klavan Show as Andrew laughs his way through Armageddon with political satire, cultural commentary, interviews and relentless mockery of racial pieties, sexual perversities, and feminist absurdities. Fridays at 8:30pm ET | 5:30pm PT.
…
continue reading
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
))
One Scene, Two Realities How Crash Experts Could Split The Karen Read Jury
Manage episode 483870944 series 2648298
Content provided by Tony Brueski and Real Story Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tony Brueski and Real Story Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
One Scene, Two Realities How Crash Experts Could Split The Karen Read Jury
A single scene. One victim. But two completely different interpretations of what happened. That’s the challenge now facing jurors in the Karen Read trial, as dueling accident reconstruction experts present radically different theories of how John O’Keefe died — and what Karen Read’s vehicle had to do with it.
In this episode, we dive deep into the war of the experts. The prosecution argues that Read reversed into O’Keefe with her Lexus SUV, leaving him fatally injured in a blizzard. But the defense has countered with their own specialists — experts who suggest the injuries are inconsistent with a vehicular strike, and that the blood patterns don't match up with a hit-and-run scenario.
So how does a jury make sense of it? Attorney Eric Faddis helps us understand what jurors are actually allowed to weigh when expert opinions directly contradict each other — and how bias, credentials, courtroom delivery, and even juror fatigue can come into play.
We also explore the consequences of this forensic standoff. Could the confusion actually benefit Read’s defense? And does “reasonable doubt” thrive in environments like this — where even seasoned professionals can't agree on the physics?
The outcome of this case may hinge on a jury’s gut instinct in choosing which expert they trust more. And that decision could mean the difference between a guilty verdict and an acquittal.
Hashtags:
#KarenRead #AccidentReconstruction #JohnOKeefe #CrashScene #ExpertWitnesses #TrueCrime #KarenReadTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ReasonableDoubt
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
A single scene. One victim. But two completely different interpretations of what happened. That’s the challenge now facing jurors in the Karen Read trial, as dueling accident reconstruction experts present radically different theories of how John O’Keefe died — and what Karen Read’s vehicle had to do with it.
In this episode, we dive deep into the war of the experts. The prosecution argues that Read reversed into O’Keefe with her Lexus SUV, leaving him fatally injured in a blizzard. But the defense has countered with their own specialists — experts who suggest the injuries are inconsistent with a vehicular strike, and that the blood patterns don't match up with a hit-and-run scenario.
So how does a jury make sense of it? Attorney Eric Faddis helps us understand what jurors are actually allowed to weigh when expert opinions directly contradict each other — and how bias, credentials, courtroom delivery, and even juror fatigue can come into play.
We also explore the consequences of this forensic standoff. Could the confusion actually benefit Read’s defense? And does “reasonable doubt” thrive in environments like this — where even seasoned professionals can't agree on the physics?
The outcome of this case may hinge on a jury’s gut instinct in choosing which expert they trust more. And that decision could mean the difference between a guilty verdict and an acquittal.
Hashtags:
#KarenRead #AccidentReconstruction #JohnOKeefe #CrashScene #ExpertWitnesses #TrueCrime #KarenReadTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ReasonableDoubt
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
9963 episodes
Share
Manage episode 483870944 series 2648298
Content provided by Tony Brueski and Real Story Media. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by Tony Brueski and Real Story Media or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
One Scene, Two Realities How Crash Experts Could Split The Karen Read Jury
A single scene. One victim. But two completely different interpretations of what happened. That’s the challenge now facing jurors in the Karen Read trial, as dueling accident reconstruction experts present radically different theories of how John O’Keefe died — and what Karen Read’s vehicle had to do with it.
In this episode, we dive deep into the war of the experts. The prosecution argues that Read reversed into O’Keefe with her Lexus SUV, leaving him fatally injured in a blizzard. But the defense has countered with their own specialists — experts who suggest the injuries are inconsistent with a vehicular strike, and that the blood patterns don't match up with a hit-and-run scenario.
So how does a jury make sense of it? Attorney Eric Faddis helps us understand what jurors are actually allowed to weigh when expert opinions directly contradict each other — and how bias, credentials, courtroom delivery, and even juror fatigue can come into play.
We also explore the consequences of this forensic standoff. Could the confusion actually benefit Read’s defense? And does “reasonable doubt” thrive in environments like this — where even seasoned professionals can't agree on the physics?
The outcome of this case may hinge on a jury’s gut instinct in choosing which expert they trust more. And that decision could mean the difference between a guilty verdict and an acquittal.
Hashtags:
#KarenRead #AccidentReconstruction #JohnOKeefe #CrashScene #ExpertWitnesses #TrueCrime #KarenReadTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ReasonableDoubt
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
A single scene. One victim. But two completely different interpretations of what happened. That’s the challenge now facing jurors in the Karen Read trial, as dueling accident reconstruction experts present radically different theories of how John O’Keefe died — and what Karen Read’s vehicle had to do with it.
In this episode, we dive deep into the war of the experts. The prosecution argues that Read reversed into O’Keefe with her Lexus SUV, leaving him fatally injured in a blizzard. But the defense has countered with their own specialists — experts who suggest the injuries are inconsistent with a vehicular strike, and that the blood patterns don't match up with a hit-and-run scenario.
So how does a jury make sense of it? Attorney Eric Faddis helps us understand what jurors are actually allowed to weigh when expert opinions directly contradict each other — and how bias, credentials, courtroom delivery, and even juror fatigue can come into play.
We also explore the consequences of this forensic standoff. Could the confusion actually benefit Read’s defense? And does “reasonable doubt” thrive in environments like this — where even seasoned professionals can't agree on the physics?
The outcome of this case may hinge on a jury’s gut instinct in choosing which expert they trust more. And that decision could mean the difference between a guilty verdict and an acquittal.
Hashtags:
#KarenRead #AccidentReconstruction #JohnOKeefe #CrashScene #ExpertWitnesses #TrueCrime #KarenReadTrial #EricFaddis #HiddenKillers #ReasonableDoubt
Want to comment and watch this podcast as a video?
Check out our YouTube Channel. https://www.youtube.com/@hiddenkillerspod
Instagram https://www.instagram.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Facebook https://www.facebook.com/hiddenkillerspod/
Tik-Tok https://www.tiktok.com/@hiddenkillerspod
X Twitter https://x.com/tonybpod
Listen Ad-Free On Apple Podcasts Here: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/true-crime-today-premium-plus-ad-free-advance-episode/id1705422872
9963 episodes
All episodes
×
Welcome to Player FM!
Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.
Similar to True Crime Today | Daily True Crime News & Interviews
Welcome to Crimetown, a series produced by Marc Smerling and Zac Stuart-Pontier in partnership with Gimlet Media. Each season, we investigate the culture of crime in a different city. In Season 2, Crimetown heads to the heart of the Rust Belt: Detroit, Michigan. From its heyday as Motor City to its rebirth as the Brooklyn of the Midwest, Detroit’s history reflects a series of issues that strike at the heart of American identity: race, poverty, policing, loss of industry, the war on drugs, an ...
…
continue reading
True crime investigations from The Atlanta Journal-Constitution. Veteran legal affairs journalist Bill Rankin takes you inside the courtroom to break down the story and the criminal justice system. This award-winning series investigates Georgia’s most important cases with fact-based reporting. Season 10 will focus on the historic indictment of former President Donald Trump in Fulton County, Georgia, led by District Attorney Fani Willis. Co-hosted by senior reporter Tamar Hallerman and editor ...
…
continue reading
The UK Column is an independent news organisation analysing the information war. Operating without financial backing or external investment, we remain free from advertisers, foundations, and political parties, relying solely on support from our audience through memberships and donations.
…
continue reading
Daily news updates from across the Slate Podcast network.
…
continue reading
David Aaronovitch and a panel of experts and insiders present in-depth explainers on big issues in the news
…
continue reading
Commentary is America's premier monthly magazine of opinion: General, yet Jewish. Highly variegated, with a unifying perspective.Listen to The Commentary Magazine Podcast, along with more than 40 other original podcasts, at Ricochet.com. No paid subscription required.
…
continue reading
Lyn and Chris Dawson appear to have the perfect marriage. He's a star footballer and popular high school teacher. She's a devoted wife and mother. They share a beautiful home above Sydney's northern beaches. But when Lyn goes missing, dark secrets are buried. This is no fairytale, but a sordid story of strangely close twin brothers, teenage student lovers, and probable murder. The Australian's Hedley Thomas digs deep into a cold case which has been unsolved for 36 years, uncovering startling ...
…
continue reading
America’s premier Sunday morning public affairs program. For nearly 70 years, Face the Nation has sought to help audiences understand how current events affect their lives. Today, that mission remains the same. Hear moderator Margaret Brennan’s illuminating and informative interviews with elected officials, policy experts and foreign leaders. Face the Nation airs Sundays at 10:30 AM, ET on the CBS Television Network and at 12 PM, ET on the CBS News Streaming Network. Face the Nation is also ...
…
continue reading
Host Marco Werman and his team of producers bring you the world's most interesting stories that remind us just how small our planet really is.
…
continue reading
End of Western Civilization got you down? All is tickety-boo on The Andrew Klavan Show as Andrew laughs his way through Armageddon with political satire, cultural commentary, interviews and relentless mockery of racial pieties, sexual perversities, and feminist absurdities. Fridays at 8:30pm ET | 5:30pm PT.
…
continue reading
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!
Go offline with the Player FM app!
