Watch The X22 Report On Video No videos found (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:17532056201798502,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-9437-3289"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs");pt> Click On Picture To See Larger PictureThe EU and many other countries are not getting free money, they were dependent on the money, now with their policies their economies are declining. ADP shows that employment is on a rebound. Trump has inflation under control, and a 150 years of data proves that he was right again, the [CB] mislead the public. The [DS] is in trouble, Trump & Elon set them up, remember when Elon said Trump was in the Epstein files. Now the D's and the fake news do not know how to get out of this and Trump has called for an investigation. The gloves are off. Trump is sending a clear message to the [DS], everything you put into place is now being reversed. The people are taking back control, Tariffs are more important than anyone realizes. Economy EU cuts economic growth forecast for 2026 The European Commission has cut its forecast for the bloc’s economic growth in 2026 amid risks posed by US tariffs and geopolitical tensions. In its twice-yearly outlook released on Monday, the European Commission said it expects the eurozone to grow by 1.2% next year, down from 1.4%, and the broader EU to grow by 1.4% instead of 1.5%. It added that the downgrade reflects higher-than-expected US tariffs on EU exports and uncertainty over possible further US moves. Source: rt.com (function(w,d,s,i){w.ldAdInit=w.ldAdInit||[];w.ldAdInit.push({slot:18510697282300316,size:[0, 0],id:"ld-8599-9832"});if(!d.getElementById(i)){var j=d.createElement(s),p=d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0];j.async=true;j.src="https://cdn2.decide.dev/_js/ajs.js";j.id=i;p.parentNode.insertBefore(j,p);}})(window,document,"script","ld-ajs"); ADP Employment Report Signals Rebound In Labor Market; Claims Confirm Resilience For the four weeks ending Oct. 31, 2025, private employers shed an average of 2,500 jobs a week, according to ADP's new weekly employment report update, suggesting that the labor market improved significantly in the last week (from an 11,250 average drop during the prior week). Extrapolating with some simple math that implies a monthly drop of 10,000 jobs... While job growth is admittedly sluggish, ADP reports that new hires are on the upswing: In October, new hires accounted for 4.4 percent of all employees, ADP payroll data shows, up from 3.9 percent a year ago. This growing share of new hires would seem to run counter to the slowed pace of hiring. That contradiction tells us a lot about today’s jobs market. New hires typically fluctuates with the business cycle, but the aging U.S. workforce means that demographics have begun playing a bigger role in hiring decisions. Source: zerohedge.com https://twitter.com/epaleezeldin/status/1990539413550420062?s=20 Under the Clean Water Act of 1972, the federal government regulates pollution and activities in certain bodies of water to protect water quality. WOTUS defines which waters fall under this federal jurisdiction—things like rivers, lakes, streams, and wetlands. The definition has been contentious for decades because a broader one means more federal oversight (e.g., requiring permits for development, farming, or industrial activities near those waters), while a narrower one shifts more control to states and reduces regulations on private land use. What is the Sackett decision?In the 2023 Supreme Court case Sackett v. EPA, the Court (in a 5-4 ruling) significantly limited the EPA's authority by narrowing WOTUS to include only "relatively permanent" bodies of water with a "continuous surface connection" to traditional navigable waters (like major rivers or oceans). This excluded many isolated or seasonal wetlands that don't have that direct link. The decision overturned broader interpretations from prior administrations, arguing that the Clean Water Act shouldn't extend to every puddle or ditch on private property. This replaces previous versions, including a 2023 Biden-era rule that had tried to expand protections post-Sackett but was challenged in courts. The new proposal aims for a "clear and durable" definition that focuses federal protections on core waters while excluding many wetlands and ephemeral streams (those that flow only after rain). Farmers and ranchers often deal with land that includes ditches, ponds, or wetlands. Under broader WOTUS definitions (like those from Obama or Biden eras), they might need federal permits for routine activities such as plowing, applying pesticides, or building fences if those features are deemed "waters." This can be costly and time-consuming, with fines for non-compliance reaching hundreds of thousands of dollars. The statement frames the narrower definition as a win for "common sense" by reducing these burdens, allowing more freedom for land use without EPA involvement. https://twitter.com/grassosteve/status/1990531850012668365?s=20 https://twitter.com/TrumpWarRoom/status/1990515596199669809?s=20 150 Years Of Data Destroy Democrat Dogma On Tariffs: Fed Study Finds They Lower, Not Raise, Inflation A new historical analysis is challenging the central premise that has guided trade policy, inflation forecasting, and Federal Reserve decision-making for decades. According to the study from the Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco spanning 150 years of tariff changes across three major Western economies, higher tariffs consistently lower inflation and raise unemployment - directly contradicting longstanding economic orthodoxy. The authors, Régis Barnichon and Aayush Singh, examined tariff shifts between 1870 and 2020 in the United States, the United Kingdom, and France - and came to the conclusion that the conventional view of tariffs causing inflation does not survive empirical scrutiny. “We find that a tariff hike raises unemployment and lowers inflation,” they write. “This goes against the predictions of standard models, whereby CPI inflation should go up in response to higher tariffs.” The authors are not claiming that tariff hikes reduce the price level, only that they consistently reduce CPI inflation - the rate at which prices rise - in the short run, and that the effect is sizable. If the historical evidence is correct, policymakers may have been responding to a threat that did not exist. The researchers also examined eight major tariff reforms driven by long-term political considerations - including the McKinley Tariff of 1890 and the Trump tariffs of 2018 - and found similar effects. The central finding is stark: a roughly four-percentage-point increase in average tariffs lowered inflation by about two percentage points and raised unemployment by roughly one percentage point. The relationship held across eras, from the pre-1913 globalization wave to the postwar period. This pattern runs directly counter to standard economic theory, which holds that tariffs raise costs, push up consumer prices, and depress economic output. Instead, the historical record shows tariffs acting more like a negative demand shock - simultaneously tightening financial conditions and suppressing inflation. . Source: zerohedge.com https://twitter.com/KobeissiLetter/status/1990838733512270107?s=20 Political/Rights https://twitter.com/AliBradleyTV/status/1990532662952382741?s=20 the individual a warning—They then tried to box agents in to prevent them from leaving. Agents issued another warning. The individual then backed up into a government vehicle, then took off leading agents on a high-speed pursuit for about a mile. The individual who is reportedly a U.S. citizen was arrested for assault on a federal agent but denied any wrongdoing. https://twitter.com/profstonge/status/1990761642888765749?s=20 https://twitter.com/StephenM/status/1990587252595159366?s=20 https://twitter.com/RapidResponse47/status/1990417719250792820?s=20 https://twitter.com/X22Report/status/1990559994518114706?s=20 actually in the Epstein files. https://twitter.com/C_3C_3/status/1990794715902718377?s=20 https://twitter.com/paulsperry_/status/1990477427710308608?s=20 https://twitter.com/JimFergusonUK/status/1990693153741975625?s=20 nothing to do with Epstein — the DEMOCRATS do.” And every name the media protects… every flight log they buried… every “friendship” they pretended didn’t exist… is about to be dragged into the light. This vote isn’t about politics. It’s about exposing the most protected network of power, blackmail, and elite privilege in modern history. Massie and Khanna forced the vote. Trump has pledged to sign it. Now the only question is: Who in Congress is willing to let the world see the truth? No more excuses. No more delays. Unseal everything. America deserves the truth — every last page. https://twitter.com/ByronYork/status/1990747191430828143?s=20 House, protected by speech/debate, to name the men the victims accuse of crimes. Associates of Epstein who stayed close to him even after his 2008 criminal conviction are on the run -- look at Lawrence Summers today. Why not name the names and be done with it? First Backfire – Former Clinton/Obama Official Goes into Hiding After Exposure of Relationship with Jeffrey Epstein Larry Summers was Bill Clinton’s Treasury Secretary and Barack Obama’s Director of the National Economic Council. Emails released as part of the legislative effort to deliver sunlight onto the creepy network of Epstein,