Search a title or topic

Over 20 million podcasts, powered by 

Player FM logo
Artwork

Content provided by China Journal of Democracy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by China Journal of Democracy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.
Player FM - Podcast App
Go offline with the Player FM app!

《中国民主季刊》2024年第四季 周保松|市场秩序与社会正义:对哈耶克理论的一 个反驳 (下)(晓泉朗读)

43:35
 
Share
 

Manage episode 450520834 series 3466836
Content provided by China Journal of Democracy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by China Journal of Democracy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

承接上篇,哈耶克主张小政府和大市场,反对以社会正义之名进行任何财富分配,可是却又认为,当代左翼自由主义代表罗尔斯的正义理论和他的观点没有实质分歧,因为他完全认同罗尔斯的“纯粹程序正义”的理
念。本文指出,这是极大的误解,因为“纯粹程序正义”的前提,是社会基本制度必须充分实现罗尔斯提出的正义原则,包括“公平的机会平等原则”和“差异原则”,因此必然对市场秩序做出各种约束和规范。要反驳罗尔斯,哈耶克可以诉诸两个论证:市场秩序更加公平,又或更为自由。本文认为,这两个论证皆不成立,因为市场秩序既无法保证参与者享有公平的机会平等,也无法保障穷人与富人在私有财产制下享有同样的自由。作者由此总结,一旦我们接受社会正义优先于市场秩序,哈耶克对资本主义的辩护便难以成立。

点击下载全文或下载《中国民主季刊》2024年第四季完整版:https://chinademocrats.org/?p=4100

  continue reading

118 episodes

Artwork
iconShare
 
Manage episode 450520834 series 3466836
Content provided by China Journal of Democracy. All podcast content including episodes, graphics, and podcast descriptions are uploaded and provided directly by China Journal of Democracy or their podcast platform partner. If you believe someone is using your copyrighted work without your permission, you can follow the process outlined here https://staging.podcastplayer.com/legal.

承接上篇,哈耶克主张小政府和大市场,反对以社会正义之名进行任何财富分配,可是却又认为,当代左翼自由主义代表罗尔斯的正义理论和他的观点没有实质分歧,因为他完全认同罗尔斯的“纯粹程序正义”的理
念。本文指出,这是极大的误解,因为“纯粹程序正义”的前提,是社会基本制度必须充分实现罗尔斯提出的正义原则,包括“公平的机会平等原则”和“差异原则”,因此必然对市场秩序做出各种约束和规范。要反驳罗尔斯,哈耶克可以诉诸两个论证:市场秩序更加公平,又或更为自由。本文认为,这两个论证皆不成立,因为市场秩序既无法保证参与者享有公平的机会平等,也无法保障穷人与富人在私有财产制下享有同样的自由。作者由此总结,一旦我们接受社会正义优先于市场秩序,哈耶克对资本主义的辩护便难以成立。

点击下载全文或下载《中国民主季刊》2024年第四季完整版:https://chinademocrats.org/?p=4100

  continue reading

118 episodes

All episodes

×
 
Loading …

Welcome to Player FM!

Player FM is scanning the web for high-quality podcasts for you to enjoy right now. It's the best podcast app and works on Android, iPhone, and the web. Signup to sync subscriptions across devices.

 

Listen to this show while you explore
Play