Unearthing Psychology's Shadow: A Critical Examination

In this episode of PsyberSpace, host Leslie Poston digs into the dark history of psychology, exploring its entanglements with colonialism, racism, sexism, and eugenics. The episode sheds light on how psychological theories and practices have upheld oppressive systems and sometimes caused harm. Poston emphasizes the importance of acknowledging these historical abuses to build a more ethical, inclusive, and just field. The episode also addresses how contemporary issues in psychology continue to reflect these historical biases, and how current scholars and practitioners are working to transform the discipline.

00:00 Introduction to the Shadow Side of Psychology
02:12 The Dark Roots of Modern Psychology
03:41 Eugenics and Its Devastating Impact
05:31 The Legacy of Intelligence Testing
09:11 Gender and Sexuality in Early Psychology
13:34 Institutional Failures and Ethical Breaches
20:01 Psychology in the Service of Profit and Control
27:41 Towards a More Ethical and Inclusive Psychology
31:15 Conclusion and Final Thoughts

Research

American Psychological Association. (2021, October). Apology to people of color for APA's role in promoting, perpetuating, and failing to challenge racism, racial discrimination, and human hierarchy in U.S.

American Psychological Association. (2021, October). Historical chronology: Examining psychology's contributions to the belief in racial hierarchy and perpetuation of inequality for people of color in U.S.

American Psychological Association. (2021, October). Role of psychology and the American Psychological Association in dismantling systemic racism against people of color in the United States.

Bakan, D. (1966). Behaviorism and American urbanization. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 2(1), 5-28.

Bank, A. (1996). Of 'native skulls' and 'noble caucasians': Phrenology in colonial South Africa. Journal of Southern African Studies, 22(3), 387-403.

Benjamin, L. T., & Baker, D. B. (2009). Recapturing a context for psychology: The role of history. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 4(1), 97–98.

Benschop, R., & Draaisma, D. (2000). In pursuit of precision: The calibration of minds and machines in late nineteenth-century psychology. Annals of Science, 57(1), 1-25.

Collins, A. F. (1999). The enduring appeal of physiognomy: Physical appearance as a sign of temperament, character, and intelligence. History of Psychology, 2(4), 251-276.

Coon, D. J. (1993). Standardizing the subject: Experimental psychologists, introspection, and the quest for a technoscientific ideal. Technology and Culture, 34(4), 757-783.

Crowther-Heyck, H. (1999). George A. Miller, language, and the computer metaphor and mind. History of Psychology, 2(1), 37-64.

Danziger, K. (1980). The history of introspection reconsidered. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 16(3), 241-262.

Fass, P. (1980). The IQ: A cultural and historical framework. American Journal of Education, 88(4), 431-458.

Galton, F. (1904). Eugenics: Its definition, scope, and aims. The American Journal of Sociology, 10(1), 1-24.

Gergen, K. J. (2001). Psychological science in a postmodern context. American Psychologist, 56(10), 803-813.

Guthrie, R. V. (2004). Even the rat was white: A historical view of psychology (2nd ed.). Pearson Education.

Harris, B. (2016). Therapeutic work and mental illness in America, c. 1830–1970. In W. Ernst (Ed.), Work, psychiatry and society, c. 1750–2015 (pp. 55-76). Manchester University Press.

Herek, G. M. (2010). Sexual orientation differences as deficits: Science and stigma in the history of American psychology. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 5(6), 693-699.

Hornstein, G. A. (1992). The return of the repressed: Psychology's problematic relations with psychoanalysis, 1909–1960. American Psychologist, 47(2), 254-263.

Kevles, D. J. (1968). Testing the Army's intelligence: Psychologists and the military in World War I. Journal of American History, 55(3), 565-581.

Klopfer, W. G. (1973). The short history of projective techniques. Journal of the History of the Behavioral Sciences, 9(1), 60-65.

Levin, B. E. (2015, September). The 10 most egregious U.S. abuses of psychology and psychiatry. Salon.

Miller, G. A. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 141-144.

Pickren, W. E. (2009). Liberating history: The context of the challenge of psychologists of color to American psychology. Cultural Diversity and Ethnic Minority Psychology, 15(4), 425-433.

Pickren, W., & Rutherford, A. (2010). A history of modern psychology in context. John Wiley & Sons.

Rutherford, A., Vaughn-Blount, K., & Ball, L. C. (2010). Responsible opposition, disruptive voices: Science, social change, and the history of feminist psychology. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 34, 460-473.

Shields, S. A. (2007). Passionate men, emotional women: Psychology constructs gender difference in the late 19th century. History of Psychology, 10(2), 92-110.

Taylor, E. (2000). Psychotherapeutics and the problematic origins of clinical psychology in America. American Psychologist, 55(9), 1029-1033.